Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Refining tree-decompositions so that they display the k-blocks

Sandra Albrechtsen

Abstract

Carmesin and Gollin proved that every finite graph has a canonical tree-decomposition $(T, \mathcal{V})$ of adhesion less than $k$ that efficiently distinguishes every two distinct $k$-profiles, and which has the further property that every separable $k$-block is equal to the unique part of $(T, \mathcal{V})$ in which it is contained. We give a shorter proof of this result by showing that such a tree-decomposition can in fact be obtained from any canonical tight tree-decomposition of adhesion less than $k$. For this, we decompose the parts of such a tree-decomposition by further tree-decompositions. As an application, we also obtain a generalization of Carmesin and Gollin's result to locally finite graphs.

Refining tree-decompositions so that they display the k-blocks

Abstract

Carmesin and Gollin proved that every finite graph has a canonical tree-decomposition of adhesion less than that efficiently distinguishes every two distinct -profiles, and which has the further property that every separable -block is equal to the unique part of in which it is contained. We give a shorter proof of this result by showing that such a tree-decomposition can in fact be obtained from any canonical tight tree-decomposition of adhesion less than . For this, we decompose the parts of such a tree-decomposition by further tree-decompositions. As an application, we also obtain a generalization of Carmesin and Gollin's result to locally finite graphs.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 8 theorems, 3 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 7 sections, 8 theorems, 3 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1

CG14:isolatingblocks*Theorem 1 Every finite graph $G$ has a canonical tree-decom-po-sition $(T, \mathcal{V})$ of adhesion less than $k$ that efficiently distinguishes every two distinct regular $k$-profiles, and which has the further property that every separable $k$-block is equal to the unique bag

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: A component $C \in \mathcal{C}'$ and the arising separation $(X_C,Y_C)$. The separations $(A,B) \in \sigma_C$ are indicated with solid lines, the separations $(A', B') \in \sigma \smallsetminus \sigma_C$ are indicated with dashed lines. The component $\tilde{C}_A$ of $G - (A \cap B)$ is contained in $C$.

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of \ref{['thm:DisplayingBlocksRefining']}
  • ...and 4 more