Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the discontinuities of Hausdorff dimension in generic dynamical Lagrange spectrum

Christian Camilo Silva Villamil

TL;DR

The paper studies how the Hausdorff dimension of the dynamical Lagrange spectrum $\mathcal{L}_{\varphi,f}$ changes with the threshold $t$ for generic perturbations of a conservative system with a mixing horseshoe. It defines the dimension function $L_{\varphi,f}(t)=HD(\mathcal{L}_{\varphi,f}\cap(-\infty,t))$ and shows, on a canonical interval $I_{\varphi,f}$ bounded by endpoints $c_{\varphi,f}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\varphi,f}$, that for generic $\varphi$ and $f$ the discontinuities of $L_{\varphi,f}$ occur at most at finitely many points away from the endpoints; in particular, at most two accumulation points of discontinuities can exist. The proof differentiates the regimes $HD(\Lambda)<1$ and $HD(\Lambda)\ge 1$, uses subhorseshoe geometry, stable/unstable Cantor sets, and connections via invariant manifolds, and reduces the high-complexity dynamics to finite-type decompositions when necessary. The results extend previous conservative-case continuity phenomena to generic non-conservative perturbations, with clear geometric implications for the structure of the dynamical Lagrange spectrum in hyperbolic dynamics on surfaces.

Abstract

Let $\varphi_0$ be a $C^2$-conservative diffeomorphism of a compact surface $S$ and let $Λ_0$ be a mixing horseshoe of $\varphi_0$. Given a smooth real function $f$ defined in $S$ and some diffeomorphism $\varphi$, close to $\varphi_0$, let $\mathcal{L}_{\varphi, f}$ be the Lagrange spectrum associated to the hyperbolic continuation $Λ(\varphi)$ of the horseshoe $Λ_0$ and $f$. We show that, for generic choices of $\varphi$ and $f$, if $L_{\varphi, f}$ is the map that gives the Hausdorff dimension of the set $\mathcal{L}_{\varphi, f}\cap (-\infty, t)$ for $t\in \mathbb{R}$, then there are at most two points that can be limit of a infinite sequence of discontinuities of $L_{\varphi, f}$.

On the discontinuities of Hausdorff dimension in generic dynamical Lagrange spectrum

TL;DR

The paper studies how the Hausdorff dimension of the dynamical Lagrange spectrum changes with the threshold for generic perturbations of a conservative system with a mixing horseshoe. It defines the dimension function and shows, on a canonical interval bounded by endpoints and , that for generic and the discontinuities of occur at most at finitely many points away from the endpoints; in particular, at most two accumulation points of discontinuities can exist. The proof differentiates the regimes and , uses subhorseshoe geometry, stable/unstable Cantor sets, and connections via invariant manifolds, and reduces the high-complexity dynamics to finite-type decompositions when necessary. The results extend previous conservative-case continuity phenomena to generic non-conservative perturbations, with clear geometric implications for the structure of the dynamical Lagrange spectrum in hyperbolic dynamics on surfaces.

Abstract

Let be a -conservative diffeomorphism of a compact surface and let be a mixing horseshoe of . Given a smooth real function defined in and some diffeomorphism , close to , let be the Lagrange spectrum associated to the hyperbolic continuation of the horseshoe and . We show that, for generic choices of and , if is the map that gives the Hausdorff dimension of the set for , then there are at most two points that can be limit of a infinite sequence of discontinuities of .
Paper Structure (16 sections, 24 theorems, 186 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 16 sections, 24 theorems, 186 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

If $\mathcal{U}\subset\textrm{Diff}^{2}(S)$ is sufficiently small, then there exists a residual subset $\mathcal{U}^{*}\subset \mathcal{U}$ with the property that for every $\varphi\in\mathcal{U}^{*}$ and any $r\geq2$, there exists a $C^r$-residual set $\mathcal{P}_{\varphi,\Lambda}\subset C^r(S,\ma and Even more,

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The subhorseshoes $\Lambda^s(t_0)$ and $\Lambda^u(t_0)$ in Proposition \ref{['conection']}.
  • Figure 2: Construction of $O(n)$.

Theorems & Definitions (42)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.6
  • ...and 32 more