Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantifying separability in RAAGs via representations

Olga Kharlampovich, Alina Vdovina

TL;DR

The paper proves that for a right-angled Artin group $L$ and a word quasiconvex (in particular, cubically convex-cocompact) subgroup $H$, there exists a finite-dimensional faithful representation $\rho_H$ such that $\overline{\rho_H(H)} \cap \rho_H(L) = \rho_H(H)$, yielding an effective, polynomial-bounded separation of $H$ from $L$ in finite quotients. The authors introduce and exploit the canonical completion in special cube complexes to obtain a finite-index subgroup $K$ built via HNN-extensions, enabling a constructive representation-theoretic separation that extends from $K$ to $L$ by induction. They provide explicit polynomial bounds on the size of separating quotients, and show that these results extend to virtually special groups and to fundamental groups of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, with implications for effective separability in broader geometric-group-theoretic contexts. The work combines geometric, combinatorial, and algebraic techniques to translate separability into a Zariski-closure separation problem, yielding practical, quantitative control over finite quotients used for separation.

Abstract

We answer the question asked by Louder, McReynolds and Patel, and prove the following statement. Let L be a RAAG, H a word quasiconvex subgroup of L, then there is a finite dimensional representation of L that separates the subgroup H in the induced Zariski topology. As a corollary, we establish a polynomial upper bound on the size of the quotients used to separate H in L. This implies the same statement for a virtually special group L and, in particular, a fundamental groups of a hyperbolic 3-manifold.

Quantifying separability in RAAGs via representations

TL;DR

The paper proves that for a right-angled Artin group and a word quasiconvex (in particular, cubically convex-cocompact) subgroup , there exists a finite-dimensional faithful representation such that , yielding an effective, polynomial-bounded separation of from in finite quotients. The authors introduce and exploit the canonical completion in special cube complexes to obtain a finite-index subgroup built via HNN-extensions, enabling a constructive representation-theoretic separation that extends from to by induction. They provide explicit polynomial bounds on the size of separating quotients, and show that these results extend to virtually special groups and to fundamental groups of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, with implications for effective separability in broader geometric-group-theoretic contexts. The work combines geometric, combinatorial, and algebraic techniques to translate separability into a Zariski-closure separation problem, yielding practical, quantitative control over finite quotients used for separation.

Abstract

We answer the question asked by Louder, McReynolds and Patel, and prove the following statement. Let L be a RAAG, H a word quasiconvex subgroup of L, then there is a finite dimensional representation of L that separates the subgroup H in the induced Zariski topology. As a corollary, we establish a polynomial upper bound on the size of the quotients used to separate H in L. This implies the same statement for a virtually special group L and, in particular, a fundamental groups of a hyperbolic 3-manifold.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 9 theorems, 12 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 5 sections, 9 theorems, 12 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $H\leq L$ be one of the following pairs of groups: (1) $L$ a RAAG, $H$ a word quasiconvex subgroup; (2) $L$ a virtually special group, $H$ a word quasiconvex subgroup; (3) $L$ a hyperbolic virtually special group, $H$ a quasiconvex subgroup. Then there is a faithful representation $\rho _H:L\rig

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: There is a local isometry $f: Y\rightarrow S(\Gamma )$ and $C(Y)$ is the canonical completion of $Y$. Only 1-skeletons are shown.

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 2
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Lemma 4
  • Proposition 5
  • Proposition 6
  • proof
  • Remark 7
  • Remark 8
  • ...and 7 more