Optimizing Vaccine Site Locations While Considering Travel Inconvenience and Public Health Outcomes
Suyanpeng Zhang, Sze-chuan Suen, Han Yu, Maged Dessouky, Fernando Ordonez
TL;DR
The paper tackles vaccine-site location optimization during COVID-19 by integrating commuting-pattern informed travel inconvenience, disease dynamics, and equitable vaccine distribution within a tractable multi-objective MILP. The approach introduces herd-immunity targets as a health proxy, derives district-level vaccination goals, and employs a detailed compartmental model to evaluate infections averted. Key findings show dispersed mega-sites can substantially reduce travel burden and increase infections averted relative to empirical LAC locations, with equity considerations further refining allocations. Practically, the framework informs policy decisions on site placement and allocation in ongoing or future vaccination campaigns, balancing accessibility, health impact, and fairness.
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there were over three million infections in Los Angeles County (LAC). To facilitate distribution when vaccines first became available, LAC set up six mega-sites for dispensing a large number of vaccines to the public. To understand if another choice of mega-site location would have improved accessibility and health outcomes, and to provide insight into future vaccine allocation problems, we propose a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming model that balances travel convenience, infection reduction, and equitable distribution. We provide a tractable objective formulation that effectively proxies real-world public health goals of reducing infections while considering travel inconvenience and equitable distribution of resources. Compared with the solution empirically used in LAC in 2020, we recommend more dispersed mega-site locations that result in a 28% reduction in travel inconvenience and avert an additional 1,000 infections.
