Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On Littlewood's estimate for the modulus of the zeta function on the critical line

Emanuel Carneiro, Micah B. Milinovich

Abstract

Inspired by a result of Soundararajan, assuming the Riemann hypothesis (RH), we prove a new inequality for the logarithm of the modulus of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line in terms of a Dirichlet polynomial over primes and prime powers. Our proof uses the Guinand-Weil explicit formula in conjunction with extremal one-sided bandlimited approximations for the Poisson kernel. As an application, by carefully estimating the Dirichlet polynomial, we revisit a 100-year-old estimate of Littlewood and give a slight refinement of the sharpest known upper bound (due to Chandee and Soundararajan) for the modulus of the zeta function on the critical line assuming RH, by providing explicit lower-order terms.

On Littlewood's estimate for the modulus of the zeta function on the critical line

Abstract

Inspired by a result of Soundararajan, assuming the Riemann hypothesis (RH), we prove a new inequality for the logarithm of the modulus of the Riemann zeta-function on the critical line in terms of a Dirichlet polynomial over primes and prime powers. Our proof uses the Guinand-Weil explicit formula in conjunction with extremal one-sided bandlimited approximations for the Poisson kernel. As an application, by carefully estimating the Dirichlet polynomial, we revisit a 100-year-old estimate of Littlewood and give a slight refinement of the sharpest known upper bound (due to Chandee and Soundararajan) for the modulus of the zeta function on the critical line assuming RH, by providing explicit lower-order terms.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 5 theorems, 61 equations)

This paper contains 15 sections, 5 theorems, 61 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Assume RH. For $t\ge 10$ and $x\ge 2$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Lemma 3: Extremal functions for the Poisson kernel
  • Lemma 4: Guinand-Weil explicit formula
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • proof