Uplink soft handover for LEO constellations: how strong the inter-satellite link should be

TL;DR

It is shown that, with soft handover, the impact of misalignment on the inter-satellite link is severe, especially at optical frequencies, while with hard handover, the impact of misalignment on the inter-satellite link is severe, especially at optical frequencies.

Abstract

We consider a constellation of low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellites connected to a handheld device on the ground. Due to the very large orbital speed, an effective handover strategy becomes of paramount importance. In particular, we study the benefits of soft handover in the uplink from the physical-layer point of view. We give a realistic model for both the ground-to-satellite and the inter-satellite links, following the 3GPP channel model for the former. We suppose that, during handover from a serving satellite to a target satellite, one of the two satellites forwards the received signal from the ground user to the other, thus acting as a relay. We quantify through simulations the loss of hard handover, compared to soft handover. For the latter, we test both amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) relaying techniques and verify that, at least in the simulated conditions, DF does not repay, in terms of block error rate (BLER), the increase of complexity with respect to AF. Also, we study the effect of the LEO constellation size on the network BLER. Finally, we show that, with soft handover, the impact of misalignment on the inter-satellite link is severe, especially at optical frequencies.

Figures (6)

• Figure 1: Swarm of $M$ satellites deployed on a circular orbit with inclination $i_{\rm K}$ with respect to the earth equatorial plane. Adjacent satellites are angularly spaced by $\alpha_0$ radiants.
• Figure 2: Geometric model of satellite $\ell$ orbiting the earth at height $h_0$. The satellite elevation angle, as observed by a GU, is denoted by $\delta_{\ell}(t)$.
• Figure 3: Comparison between AF and DF with $f_c = 193$ THz and $N = 42$ satellites.
• Figure 4: Comparison between AF and DF with $f_c = 193$ THz and $M = 63$ satellites.
• Figure 5: The scenario with misalignment on the ISL. Parameters: $M = 42$, $P_T = 25$ dBW.