Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Science based AI model certification for untrained operational environments with application in traffic state estimation

Daryl Mupupuni, Anupama Guntu, Liang Hong, Kamrul Hasan, Leehyun Keel

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of deploying pre-trained AI systems in unobserved operational environments by proposing a science-based certification framework that blends domain physics with data-driven AI to ensure trustworthy and safe performance in traffic state estimation (TSE). It leverages physics concepts such as conservation of traffic, the LWR flow model, and the Greenshields diagram, and uses the Lax-Hopf method to generate synthetic datasets that respect critical parameters like $v_f$ and $\rho_m$. Through a synthetic-TSE study with a deep neural network trained under a fixed environment, the work demonstrates that physics-based constraints can quantify inconsistencies and reveal performance degradation when operating outside training conditions, achieving a best reported DL error of $17.81\%$ at the trained environment. The study lays a foundation for certified, explainable AI in safety-critical, data-limited contexts and points toward physics-regularized and transfer-learning extensions for broader deployment.

Abstract

The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments, involving substantial investments in data collection and model training. Rapid application of AI necessitates evaluating the feasibility of utilizing pre-trained models in unobserved operational settings with minimal or no additional data. However, interpreting the opaque nature of AI's black-box models remains a persistent challenge. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in untrained operational environments. The methodology advocates a profound integration of domain knowledge, leveraging theoretical and analytical models from physics and related disciplines, with data-driven AI models. This novel approach introduces tools to facilitate the development of secure engineering systems, providing decision-makers with confidence in the trustworthiness and safety of AI-based models across diverse environments characterized by limited training data and dynamic, uncertain conditions. The paper demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology in real-world safety-critical scenarios, particularly in the context of traffic state estimation. Through simulation results, the study illustrates how the proposed methodology efficiently quantifies physical inconsistencies exhibited by pre-trained AI models. By utilizing analytical models, the methodology offers a means to gauge the applicability of pre-trained AI models in new operational environments. This research contributes to advancing the understanding and deployment of AI models, offering a robust certification framework that enhances confidence in their reliability and safety across a spectrum of operational conditions.

Science based AI model certification for untrained operational environments with application in traffic state estimation

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of deploying pre-trained AI systems in unobserved operational environments by proposing a science-based certification framework that blends domain physics with data-driven AI to ensure trustworthy and safe performance in traffic state estimation (TSE). It leverages physics concepts such as conservation of traffic, the LWR flow model, and the Greenshields diagram, and uses the Lax-Hopf method to generate synthetic datasets that respect critical parameters like and . Through a synthetic-TSE study with a deep neural network trained under a fixed environment, the work demonstrates that physics-based constraints can quantify inconsistencies and reveal performance degradation when operating outside training conditions, achieving a best reported DL error of at the trained environment. The study lays a foundation for certified, explainable AI in safety-critical, data-limited contexts and points toward physics-regularized and transfer-learning extensions for broader deployment.

Abstract

The expanding role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in diverse engineering domains highlights the challenges associated with deploying AI models in new operational environments, involving substantial investments in data collection and model training. Rapid application of AI necessitates evaluating the feasibility of utilizing pre-trained models in unobserved operational settings with minimal or no additional data. However, interpreting the opaque nature of AI's black-box models remains a persistent challenge. Addressing this issue, this paper proposes a science-based certification methodology to assess the viability of employing pre-trained data-driven models in untrained operational environments. The methodology advocates a profound integration of domain knowledge, leveraging theoretical and analytical models from physics and related disciplines, with data-driven AI models. This novel approach introduces tools to facilitate the development of secure engineering systems, providing decision-makers with confidence in the trustworthiness and safety of AI-based models across diverse environments characterized by limited training data and dynamic, uncertain conditions. The paper demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology in real-world safety-critical scenarios, particularly in the context of traffic state estimation. Through simulation results, the study illustrates how the proposed methodology efficiently quantifies physical inconsistencies exhibited by pre-trained AI models. By utilizing analytical models, the methodology offers a means to gauge the applicability of pre-trained AI models in new operational environments. This research contributes to advancing the understanding and deployment of AI models, offering a robust certification framework that enhances confidence in their reliability and safety across a spectrum of operational conditions.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 4 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 4 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Speed against density diagram in traffic flow
  • Figure 2: Certification process
  • Figure 3: Dataset generated with a $v_f$ =25
  • Figure 4: DL estimations for $v_f$=25.
  • Figure 5: DL error against Vf