Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Maximal ideals of reduced group C*-algebras and Thompson's groups

Kevin Aguyar Brix, Chris Bruce, Kang Li, Eduardo Scarparo

TL;DR

The paper develops a Galois-connection framework between ideal lattices arising from a conditional expectation $P:B\to A$, defining $Ind_P$ and $Coind_P$ to relate ideals in $A$ and $B$. It proves broad equivalences that characterize when maximal ideals are induced and when $Ind_P$ yields a bijection between maximal co-induced ideals of $A$ and maximal ideals of $B$. Applying this to reduced group C*-algebras and Furstenberg boundary stabilizers, it shows that every maximal ideal of $C^*_r(G)$ is induced from a maximal ideal of $C^*(G_x)$ for $x\in\partial_F G$, and that the bijection reduces the maximal-ideal problem to amenable isotropy groups. The Thompson groups T and F are then analyzed: $C^*_r(T)$ always has a unique maximal ideal, and if $F$ is amenable, $C^*_r(T)$ has infinitely many ideals, with several amenability-characterizing equivalences in terms of the ideal structure of $C^*_r(T)$. These results connect dynamical properties on the Furstenberg boundary with the lattice of ideals in both full and reduced group C*-algebras, providing a unified route to understanding maximal ideals via amenable isotropy.

Abstract

Given a conditional expectation $P$ from a C*-algebra $B$ onto a C*-subalgebra $A$, we observe that induction of ideals via $P$, together with a map which we call co-induction, forms a Galois connection between the lattices of ideals of $A$ and $B$. Using properties of this Galois connection, we show that, given a discrete group $G$ and a stabilizer subgroup $G_x$ for the action of $G$ on its Furstenberg boundary, induction gives a bijection between the set of maximal co-induced ideals of $C^*(G_x)$ and the set of maximal ideals of $C^*_r(G)$. As an application, we prove that the reduced C*-algebra of Thompson's group $T$ has a unique maximal ideal. Furthermore, we show that, if Thompson's group $F$ is amenable, then $C^*_r(T)$ has infinitely many ideals.

Maximal ideals of reduced group C*-algebras and Thompson's groups

TL;DR

The paper develops a Galois-connection framework between ideal lattices arising from a conditional expectation , defining and to relate ideals in and . It proves broad equivalences that characterize when maximal ideals are induced and when yields a bijection between maximal co-induced ideals of and maximal ideals of . Applying this to reduced group C*-algebras and Furstenberg boundary stabilizers, it shows that every maximal ideal of is induced from a maximal ideal of for , and that the bijection reduces the maximal-ideal problem to amenable isotropy groups. The Thompson groups T and F are then analyzed: always has a unique maximal ideal, and if is amenable, has infinitely many ideals, with several amenability-characterizing equivalences in terms of the ideal structure of . These results connect dynamical properties on the Furstenberg boundary with the lattice of ideals in both full and reduced group C*-algebras, providing a unified route to understanding maximal ideals via amenable isotropy.

Abstract

Given a conditional expectation from a C*-algebra onto a C*-subalgebra , we observe that induction of ideals via , together with a map which we call co-induction, forms a Galois connection between the lattices of ideals of and . Using properties of this Galois connection, we show that, given a discrete group and a stabilizer subgroup for the action of on its Furstenberg boundary, induction gives a bijection between the set of maximal co-induced ideals of and the set of maximal ideals of . As an application, we prove that the reduced C*-algebra of Thompson's group has a unique maximal ideal. Furthermore, we show that, if Thompson's group is amenable, then has infinitely many ideals.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 20 theorems, 32 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 20 theorems, 32 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $P$ be a conditional expectation from a unital C*-algebra $B$ onto a unital C*-algebra $A$. The following conditions are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (45)

  • Theorem A: Theorem \ref{['thm:maxideals']}
  • Theorem B: Theorem \ref{['thm:mi']}
  • Theorem C: Theorem \ref{['thm:th']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Example 2.5: Ozawa
  • Remark 2.6
  • ...and 35 more