Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Share-a-Ride Problem with mixed ride-hailing and logistic vehicles

Wen Ji, Shenglin Liu, Ke Han, Tao Liu

Abstract

This study explores the potential of using ride-hailing vehicles (RVs) for integrated passenger and freight transport based on shared mobility. In this crowd-sourced mode, ride-hailing platforms can profit from parcel delivery services, and logistics companies can reduce operational costs by utilizing the capacities of RVs. The Share-a-Ride problem with ride-hailing and logistic vehicles (SARP-RL) determines the number of logistic vehicles (LVs) and the assignment of passenger/parcel requests to RVs and LVs, aiming at maximizing the total RV profits and minimizing logistic costs. An exact solution framework is proposed by (1) generating a feasible trip that serves a given set of requests at maximal profits; (2) generating all feasible trips for the entire set of passenger and parcel requests via an efficient enumeration method; and (3) finding all Pareto-optimal solutions of the bi-objective problem via an $\varepsilon$-constraint method. Not only is the proposed method exact, it also converts the NP-hard problem to a simple vehicle-trip matching problem. More importantly, the total computational time can be compressed to an arbitrary degree via straightforward parallelization. A case study of the Manhattan network demonstrates the solution characteristics of SARP-RL. The results indicate that: (i) Coordinating RV and LV operations to serve passenger and parcel requests (SARP-RL) can simultaneously reduce logistic costs and increase RV profits. (ii) Key factors influencing the performance of SARP-RL include the RV fleet size, spatial distribution of parcel requests, passenger/parcel request ratio, and unit price of transport service, which are quantitatively analyzed to offer managerial insights for real-world implementation.

The Share-a-Ride Problem with mixed ride-hailing and logistic vehicles

Abstract

This study explores the potential of using ride-hailing vehicles (RVs) for integrated passenger and freight transport based on shared mobility. In this crowd-sourced mode, ride-hailing platforms can profit from parcel delivery services, and logistics companies can reduce operational costs by utilizing the capacities of RVs. The Share-a-Ride problem with ride-hailing and logistic vehicles (SARP-RL) determines the number of logistic vehicles (LVs) and the assignment of passenger/parcel requests to RVs and LVs, aiming at maximizing the total RV profits and minimizing logistic costs. An exact solution framework is proposed by (1) generating a feasible trip that serves a given set of requests at maximal profits; (2) generating all feasible trips for the entire set of passenger and parcel requests via an efficient enumeration method; and (3) finding all Pareto-optimal solutions of the bi-objective problem via an -constraint method. Not only is the proposed method exact, it also converts the NP-hard problem to a simple vehicle-trip matching problem. More importantly, the total computational time can be compressed to an arbitrary degree via straightforward parallelization. A case study of the Manhattan network demonstrates the solution characteristics of SARP-RL. The results indicate that: (i) Coordinating RV and LV operations to serve passenger and parcel requests (SARP-RL) can simultaneously reduce logistic costs and increase RV profits. (ii) Key factors influencing the performance of SARP-RL include the RV fleet size, spatial distribution of parcel requests, passenger/parcel request ratio, and unit price of transport service, which are quantitatively analyzed to offer managerial insights for real-world implementation.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 2 theorems, 14 equations, 11 figures, 4 tables, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 25 sections, 2 theorems, 14 equations, 11 figures, 4 tables, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 4.1

If a subset of requests $\mathcal{R}^*=\{r_1, ..., r_n\}$ cannot form a trip, then neither can $\mathcal{R}^*\cup\{r_{n+1}\}$ for any $r_{n+1}\in \mathcal{R}\setminus\mathcal{R}^*$.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Solution framework for the proposed SARP-RL.
  • Figure 2: Number of trips of 8 random datasets under various request quantities $l$.
  • Figure 3: Left: Road network and taxi zones of Manhattan, New York City. Right: Spatial distribution of number of passenger trip requests in Manhattan between 13:00 and 14:00 on January 3, 2022.
  • Figure 4: Five spatial distributions of parcel requests: SS, SC (South), SC (North), CS (South) and CS (North). The red ends of the arcs represent the origins, and the blue ends represent the destinations. The yellow arcs represent passenger requests.
  • Figure 5: Left: Increase of total RV profits (%) of five parcel distributions under the same number of RVs for SARP-RL versus RV-only. Right: LV fleet size saving of five parcel distributions under the same number of RVs for SARP-RL versus LV-only. The experimental results are based on the demand scenarios SS-76-24, SC(South)-76-24, SC(North)-76-24, CS(South)-76-24 and CS(North)-76-24.
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (6)

  • Definition 3.1
  • Lemma 4.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4.2
  • proof
  • Remark 5.1