Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Hakim Sidahmed, Samrat Phatale, Alex Hutcheson, Zhuonan Lin, Zhang Chen, Zac Yu, Jarvis Jin, Simral Chaudhary, Roman Komarytsia, Christiane Ahlheim, Yonghao Zhu, Bowen Li, Saravanan Ganesh, Bill Byrne, Jessica Hoffmann, Hassan Mansoor, Wei Li, Abhinav Rastogi, Lucas Dixon
TL;DR
This paper tackles the high computational and memory demands of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) by introducing Parameter-Efficient RLHF (PE-RLHF) that leverages LoRA adapters to fine-tune both reward modeling and policy components while freezing the backbone. Through extensive benchmarks across six datasets spanning text summarization, harmless/helpful responses, UI automation, and visual question answering, PE-RLHF achieves performance comparable to standard RLHF but with substantial resource savings: up to 90% faster RM training and up to 30% faster RL, along with memory reductions around 50% for reward modeling. The study provides thorough ablations over LoRA ranks and model sizes, showing that larger backbones benefit PE-RLHF, while rank has a limited effect on RM and a modest effect on RL. Overall, PE-RLHF offers a practical, scalable path to aligning large language and vision-language models with human preferences, enabling broader deployment while maintaining alignment quality.
Abstract
While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) effectively aligns pretrained Large Language and Vision-Language Models (LLMs, and VLMs) with human preferences, its computational cost and complexity hamper its wider adoption. To alleviate some of the computational burden of fine-tuning, parameter efficient methods, like LoRA were introduced. In this work, we empirically evaluate the setup of Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (PE-RLHF) that leverages LoRA fine-tuning for Reward Modeling, and Reinforcement Learning. We benchmark the PE-RLHF setup on six diverse datasets spanning summarization, harmless/helpful response generation, UI automation, and visual question answering in terms of effectiveness of the trained models, and the training resources required. Our findings show, for the first time, that PE-RLHF achieves comparable performance to RLHF, while significantly reducing training time (up to 90% faster for reward models, and 30% faster for RL), and memory footprint (up to 50% reduction for reward models, and 27% for RL). We provide comprehensive ablations across LoRA ranks, and model sizes for both reward modeling and reinforcement learning. By mitigating the computational burden associated with RLHF, we push for a broader adoption of PE-RLHF as an alignment technique for LLMs and VLMs.
