Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Decentralizing Coherent Joint Transmission Precoding via Deterministic Equivalents

Yuhao Liu, Xinyu Bian, Yizhou Xu, Tianqi Hou, Wenjie Wang, Yuyi Mao, Jun Zhang

TL;DR

This work tackles downlink inter-cell interference in multi-cell CJT by enabling decentralized precoding that relies on deterministic equivalents (DE) to approximate interference using only channel covariances. The method decouples the global power-minimization problem into per-BS subproblems, avoiding exchange of instantaneous CSI while preserving performance near that of a centralized optimum. A centralized computation step can be used for reference but the DE-based approach eliminates it in practice, requiring only covariance information exchange. Simulations show the decentralized scheme achieves within 2–7% of the optimal centralized power with substantial reductions in signaling and latency, indicating practical viability for scalable CoMP in dense networks and suggesting extensions to multi-stream and lower-complexity solvers.

Abstract

In order to control the inter-cell interference for a multi-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output network, we consider the precoder design for coordinated multi-point with downlink coherent joint transmission. To avoid costly information exchange among the cooperating base stations in a centralized precoding scheme, we propose a decentralized one by considering the power minimization problem. By approximating the inter-cell interference using the deterministic equivalents, this problem is decoupled to sub-problems which are solved in a decentralized manner at different base stations. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed decentralized precoding scheme, where only 2 ~ 7% more transmit power is needed compared with the optimal centralized precoder.

Decentralizing Coherent Joint Transmission Precoding via Deterministic Equivalents

TL;DR

This work tackles downlink inter-cell interference in multi-cell CJT by enabling decentralized precoding that relies on deterministic equivalents (DE) to approximate interference using only channel covariances. The method decouples the global power-minimization problem into per-BS subproblems, avoiding exchange of instantaneous CSI while preserving performance near that of a centralized optimum. A centralized computation step can be used for reference but the DE-based approach eliminates it in practice, requiring only covariance information exchange. Simulations show the decentralized scheme achieves within 2–7% of the optimal centralized power with substantial reductions in signaling and latency, indicating practical viability for scalable CoMP in dense networks and suggesting extensions to multi-stream and lower-complexity solvers.

Abstract

In order to control the inter-cell interference for a multi-cell multi-user multiple-input multiple-output network, we consider the precoder design for coordinated multi-point with downlink coherent joint transmission. To avoid costly information exchange among the cooperating base stations in a centralized precoding scheme, we propose a decentralized one by considering the power minimization problem. By approximating the inter-cell interference using the deterministic equivalents, this problem is decoupled to sub-problems which are solved in a decentralized manner at different base stations. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed decentralized precoding scheme, where only 2 ~ 7% more transmit power is needed compared with the optimal centralized precoder.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 2 theorems, 17 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 9 sections, 2 theorems, 17 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let Assumptions (eq:ass2) and (eq:ass3) hold. We have $\max_{i,p} |\lambda_{ip}^* - \overline{\lambda}_{ip}| \to 0$ almost surely where The value of $\overline{m}_{ip}$ is determined as the unique non-negative solution to the following system of equations, computed for $p \in \mathcal{T}, i \in \mathcal{U}$,

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Total power consumption versus the number of antennas at each BS.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2