Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the stack of 0-dimensional coherent sheaves: motivic aspects

Barbara Fantechi, Andrea T. Ricolfi

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of understanding motivic invariants of the stack $\mathscr{C}oh^n(X)$ of $0$-dimensional coherent sheaves by embedding it into the Grothendieck ring of stacks and connecting it to Quot schemes via Coh-to-Chow and Quot-to-Chow morphisms. It develops a framework of motivic decompositions using stratifications by support and singularity types, and demonstrates that punctual contributions depend only on local formal neighbourhoods, enabling explicit generating-function formulas in low dimensions. The main contributions include establishing motivic identities for $[\mathscr{C}oh^n(X)]$ and $[\mathrm{Quot}_X(\mathcal E,n)]$, constructing the punctual generating functions $\mathsf Z_{\sigma}(t)$ and $\mathsf Q_{r,\sigma}(t)$, and proving that punctual motives are controlled by local models like $\mathbb A^d$, all within the power-structure framework. This provides a foundation for explicit motivic computations in dimensions $\le 2$ and a roadmap for higher-dimensional extensions, with potential relevance to enumerative geometry and refined invariants.

Abstract

Let $X$ be a variety. In this survey, we study (decompositions of) the motivic class, in the Grothendieck ring of stacks, of the stack $\mathscr{C}oh^n(X)$ of $0$-dimensional coherent sheaves of length $n$ on $X$. To do so, we review the construction of the support map $\mathscr{C}oh^n(X) \to \mathrm{Sym}^n(X)$ to the symmetric product and we prove that, for any closed point $p \in X$, the motive of the punctual stack $\mathscr{C}oh^n(X)_p$ parametrising sheaves supported at $p$ only depends on a formal neighbourhood of $p$. We perform the same analysis for the Quot-to-Chow morphism $\mathrm{Quot}_X(\mathcal E,n) \to \mathrm{Sym}^n(X)$, for a fixed sheaf $\mathcal E \in \mathrm{Coh}(X)$.

On the stack of 0-dimensional coherent sheaves: motivic aspects

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of understanding motivic invariants of the stack of -dimensional coherent sheaves by embedding it into the Grothendieck ring of stacks and connecting it to Quot schemes via Coh-to-Chow and Quot-to-Chow morphisms. It develops a framework of motivic decompositions using stratifications by support and singularity types, and demonstrates that punctual contributions depend only on local formal neighbourhoods, enabling explicit generating-function formulas in low dimensions. The main contributions include establishing motivic identities for and , constructing the punctual generating functions and , and proving that punctual motives are controlled by local models like , all within the power-structure framework. This provides a foundation for explicit motivic computations in dimensions and a roadmap for higher-dimensional extensions, with potential relevance to enumerative geometry and refined invariants.

Abstract

Let be a variety. In this survey, we study (decompositions of) the motivic class, in the Grothendieck ring of stacks, of the stack of -dimensional coherent sheaves of length on . To do so, we review the construction of the support map to the symmetric product and we prove that, for any closed point , the motive of the punctual stack parametrising sheaves supported at only depends on a formal neighbourhood of . We perform the same analysis for the Quot-to-Chow morphism , for a fixed sheaf .
Paper Structure (28 sections, 25 theorems, 105 equations)

This paper contains 28 sections, 25 theorems, 105 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $X$ be a $\mathbf{k}$-variety, $Z\hookrightarrow X$ a closed subscheme with complement $U = X \setminus Z$, and $n \in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\geqslant 0}$ an integer.

Theorems & Definitions (74)

  • Theorem A: \ref{['prop:coh-dec']}, \ref{['cor:quot-dec']}
  • Theorem B: \ref{['thm:punctual-smooth-point']}, \ref{['thm:quot-punctual']}
  • Theorem C: \ref{['thm:gen-fct-coh']}, \ref{['thm:Quot-Series']}
  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Proposition 1.7: Hartshorne_AG
  • ...and 64 more