Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Fine boundary continuity for degenerate double-phase diffusion

Simone Ciani, Eurica Henriques, Igor Skrypnik

Abstract

We study the boundary behavior of solutions to parabolic double-phase equations through the celebrated Wiener's sufficiency criterion. The analysis is conducted for cylindrical domains and the regularity up to the lateral boundary is shown in terms of either its $p$ or $q$ capacity, depending on whether the phase vanishes at the boundary or not. Eventually we obtain a fine boundary estimate that, when considering uniform geometric conditions as density or fatness, leads us to the boundary Hölder continuity of solutions. In particular, the double-phase elicits new questions on the definition of an adapted capacity.

Fine boundary continuity for degenerate double-phase diffusion

Abstract

We study the boundary behavior of solutions to parabolic double-phase equations through the celebrated Wiener's sufficiency criterion. The analysis is conducted for cylindrical domains and the regularity up to the lateral boundary is shown in terms of either its or capacity, depending on whether the phase vanishes at the boundary or not. Eventually we obtain a fine boundary estimate that, when considering uniform geometric conditions as density or fatness, leads us to the boundary Hölder continuity of solutions. In particular, the double-phase elicits new questions on the definition of an adapted capacity.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 13 theorems, 200 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 23 sections, 13 theorems, 200 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $(x_o,t_o) \in S_T$ and let $u$ be a bounded, weak solution to the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem C-pb. Depending on the point $(x_o,t_o)$, we assume that either or Then, in each case respectively, there exist $\{\rho_0(p),\eta_0(p)\}$, $\{ \rho_0(q), \eta_0(q)\}$ couples of positive numbers depending only on the data and conditions eq1.6-eq1.7, and positive constants $\gamma, \hat{\gamma}, \gamm

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Scheme of the geometric setting of the proof. For the definition of $\eta^*,\eta_*$ see Subsection \ref{['geometric setting']} below. Considered a same radius $r$, when $a(x_o,t_o)$ approaches zero, $\eta_*$ stretches to infinity while $\eta^*$ stays unvaried. This motivates the reduction of radii $r<R$ in the former case, according to the size of the phase.
  • Figure 2: Comparing time lengths in proof of Lemma \ref{['lem3.3']}.

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Lemma 3.1: Energy Estimates
  • Lemma 3.2: Initial-values Critical Mass
  • proof
  • Remark 3.3
  • Corollary 3.4
  • ...and 15 more