Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Ohba Number and Generalized Ohba Numbers of Complete Bipartite Graphs

Kennedy Cano, Emily Gutknecht, Gautham Kappaganthula, George Miller, Jeffrey A. Mudrock, Ezekiel Thornburgh

TL;DR

This work analyzes the Ohba number $\tau_0(a,b)$ and the generalized Ohba numbers $\tau_s(a,b)$ for complete bipartite graphs $K_{a,b}$, extending Noel's question N14. It proves $\tau_0(2,b)=\lfloor\sqrt{b}\rfloor-1$ for all $b\ge2$ and establishes $\tau_0(a,b)=\Omega(\sqrt{b})$ as $b\to\infty$ for fixed $a\ge2$, while developing lower and upper bounds for $\tau_s(a,b)$ in the generalized setting. The authors derive precise bounds when $a=s+2$ and provide exact values for select small $(s,b)$, illustrating the tightness of bounds and suggesting asymptotic behavior $\tau_s(a,b)=\Theta(b^{1/(2s+2)})$ under certain conditions. The results deepen understanding of chromatic-choosability via graph joins and raise open questions about tightness and asymptotics for broader parameter ranges.

Abstract

We say that a graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is equal to its chromatic number $χ(G)$. Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph $G$ there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and a complete graph on at least $N$ vertices is chromatic-choosable. The Ohba number of $G$ is the smallest such $N$. In 2014, Noel suggested studying the Ohba number, $τ_{0}(a,b)$, of complete bipartite graphs with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$. In this paper we improve a 2009 result of Allagan by showing that $τ_{0}(2,b) = \lfloor \sqrt{b} \rfloor - 1$ for all $b \geq 2$, and we show that for $a \geq 2$, $τ_{0}(a,b) = Ω( \sqrt{b} )$ as $b \rightarrow \infty$. We also initiate the study of some relaxed versions of the Ohba number of a graph which we call generalized Ohba numbers. We present some upper and lower bounds of generalized Ohba numbers of complete bipartite graphs while also posing some questions.

On the Ohba Number and Generalized Ohba Numbers of Complete Bipartite Graphs

TL;DR

This work analyzes the Ohba number and the generalized Ohba numbers for complete bipartite graphs , extending Noel's question N14. It proves for all and establishes as for fixed , while developing lower and upper bounds for in the generalized setting. The authors derive precise bounds when and provide exact values for select small , illustrating the tightness of bounds and suggesting asymptotic behavior under certain conditions. The results deepen understanding of chromatic-choosability via graph joins and raise open questions about tightness and asymptotics for broader parameter ranges.

Abstract

We say that a graph is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number is equal to its chromatic number . Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph there is an such that the join of and a complete graph on at least vertices is chromatic-choosable. The Ohba number of is the smallest such . In 2014, Noel suggested studying the Ohba number, , of complete bipartite graphs with partite sets of size and . In this paper we improve a 2009 result of Allagan by showing that for all , and we show that for , as . We also initiate the study of some relaxed versions of the Ohba number of a graph which we call generalized Ohba numbers. We present some upper and lower bounds of generalized Ohba numbers of complete bipartite graphs while also posing some questions.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 28 theorems, 26 equations)

This paper contains 7 sections, 28 theorems, 26 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $\chi_\ell(K_{k,t})=k+1$ if and only if $t \geq k^k$.

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2: NR15
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4: A09
  • Lemma 5
  • Theorem 6
  • Corollary 7
  • Theorem 8
  • Theorem 9
  • ...and 36 more