Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A direct proof of well-definedness for the polymatroid Tutte polynomial

Xiaxia Guan, Xian'an Jin

Abstract

For a polymatroid $P$ over $[n]$, Bernardi, Kálmán and Postnikov [\emph{Adv. Math.} 402 (2022) 108355] introduced the polymatroid Tutte polynomial $\mathscr{T}_{P}$ relying on the order $1<2<\cdots<n$ of $[n]$, which generalizes the classical Tutte polynomial from matroids to polymatroids. They proved the independence of this order by the fact that $\mathscr{T}_{P}$ is equivalent to another polynomial that only depends on $P$. In this paper, similar to the Tutte's original proof of the well-definedness of the Tutte polynomial defined by the summation over all spanning trees using activities depending on the order of edges, we give a direct and elementary proof of the well-definedness of the polymatroid Tutte polynomial.

A direct proof of well-definedness for the polymatroid Tutte polynomial

Abstract

For a polymatroid over , Bernardi, Kálmán and Postnikov [\emph{Adv. Math.} 402 (2022) 108355] introduced the polymatroid Tutte polynomial relying on the order of , which generalizes the classical Tutte polynomial from matroids to polymatroids. They proved the independence of this order by the fact that is equivalent to another polynomial that only depends on . In this paper, similar to the Tutte's original proof of the well-definedness of the Tutte polynomial defined by the summation over all spanning trees using activities depending on the order of edges, we give a direct and elementary proof of the well-definedness of the polymatroid Tutte polynomial.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 10 theorems, 42 equations, 3 tables)

This paper contains 3 sections, 10 theorems, 42 equations, 3 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.5

Bernardi For any polymatroid $P$, we have that

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Definition 1.7
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • ...and 10 more