Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Revised BDS Test

Wenya Luo, Zhidong Bai, Jiang Hu, Chen Wang

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the BDS test, which is a nonparametric test of independence. Specifically, the null hypothesis $H_{0}$ of it is that $\{u_{t}\}$ is i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed), where $\{u_{t}\}$ is a random sequence. The BDS test is widely used in economics and finance, but it has a weakness that cannot be ignored: over-rejecting $H_{0}$ even if the length $T$ of $\{u_{t}\}$ is as large as $(100,2000)$. To improve the over-rejection problem of BDS test, considering that the correlation integral is the foundation of BDS test, we not only accurately describe the expectation of the correlation integral under $H_{0}$, but also calculate all terms of the asymptotic variance of the correlation integral whose order is $O(T^{-1})$ and $O(T^{-2})$, which is essential to improve the finite sample performance of BDS test. Based on this, we propose a revised BDS (RBDS) test and prove its asymptotic normality under $H_{0}$. The RBDS test not only inherits all the advantages of the BDS test, but also effectively corrects the over-rejection problem of the BDS test, which can be fully confirmed by the simulation results we presented. Moreover, based on the simulation results, we find that similar to BDS test, RBDS test would also be affected by the parameter estimations of the ARCH-type model, resulting in size distortion, but this phenomenon can be alleviated by the logarithmic transformation preprocessing of the estimate residuals of the model. Besides, through some actual datasets that have been demonstrated to fit well with ARCH-type models, we also compared the performance of BDS test and RBDS test in evaluating the goodness-of-fit of the model in empirical problem, and the results reflect that, under the same condition, the performance of the RBDS test is more encouraging.

Revised BDS Test

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the BDS test, which is a nonparametric test of independence. Specifically, the null hypothesis of it is that is i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed), where is a random sequence. The BDS test is widely used in economics and finance, but it has a weakness that cannot be ignored: over-rejecting even if the length of is as large as . To improve the over-rejection problem of BDS test, considering that the correlation integral is the foundation of BDS test, we not only accurately describe the expectation of the correlation integral under , but also calculate all terms of the asymptotic variance of the correlation integral whose order is and , which is essential to improve the finite sample performance of BDS test. Based on this, we propose a revised BDS (RBDS) test and prove its asymptotic normality under . The RBDS test not only inherits all the advantages of the BDS test, but also effectively corrects the over-rejection problem of the BDS test, which can be fully confirmed by the simulation results we presented. Moreover, based on the simulation results, we find that similar to BDS test, RBDS test would also be affected by the parameter estimations of the ARCH-type model, resulting in size distortion, but this phenomenon can be alleviated by the logarithmic transformation preprocessing of the estimate residuals of the model. Besides, through some actual datasets that have been demonstrated to fit well with ARCH-type models, we also compared the performance of BDS test and RBDS test in evaluating the goodness-of-fit of the model in empirical problem, and the results reflect that, under the same condition, the performance of the RBDS test is more encouraging.
Paper Structure (12 sections, 3 theorems, 138 equations, 12 figures, 7 tables)

This paper contains 12 sections, 3 theorems, 138 equations, 12 figures, 7 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

If $\{u_{t}\}$ is i.i.d., for fixed $m$, where where $\widetilde{\sigma}_m^2$ is equal to the variance in Theorem 2.1 of Luo et al.(2020), where $\mathcal{M}_{T,m}(k)=(T-4m-k+3)(T-4m-k+4)$, $i=m-hk$, $h=\lfloor{\frac{m}{k}}\rfloor$.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Graphics for $\omega_{l}^{r}$.
  • Figure 2: Graph for $\eta_{l}^{l-1}$.
  • Figure 3: Graph for $\xi_{l}^{\kappa}$.
  • Figure 4: Time Plots of Three Databases
  • Figure 5: Sample ACF and PACF of various functions of three datasets: (a) ACF of the log returns of CREF, (b) ACF of the squared log returns of CREF, (c) ACF of the log returns of IBM, (d) ACF of the squared log returns of IBM, (e) ACF of the exchange rate, (f) ACF of the squared exchange rate.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['ThCLTCI']}
  • Remark 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['ThCLTKCI']}
  • Remark 4.1
  • Corollary 4.1
  • proof : Proof of Corollary \ref{['CLTRBDS']}
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['ThCLTCI']}:
  • ...and 1 more