Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-negative solutions of a sublinear elliptic problem

Julián López-Gómez, Paul H. Rabinowitz, Fabio Zanolin

Abstract

In this paper the existence of solutions, $(λ,u)$, of the problem $$-Δu=λu -a(x)|u|^{p-1}u \quad \hbox{in }Ω, \qquad u=0 \quad \hbox{on}\;\;\partialΩ,$$ is explored for $0 < p < 1$. When $p>1$, it is known that there is an unbounded component of such solutions bifurcating from $(σ_1, 0)$, where $σ_1$ is the smallest eigenvalue of $-Δ$ in $Ω$ under Dirichlet boundary conditions on $\partialΩ$. These solutions have $u \in P$, the interior of the positive cone. The continuation argument used when $p>1$ to keep $u \in P$ fails if $0 < p < 1$. Nevertheless when $0 < p < 1$, we are still able to show that there is a component of solutions bifurcating from $(σ_1, \infty)$, unbounded outside of a neighborhood of $(σ_1, \infty)$, and having $u \gneq 0$. This non-negativity for $u$ cannot be improved as is shown via a detailed analysis of the simplest autonomous one-dimensional version of the problem: its set of non-negative solutions possesses a countable set of components, each of them consisting of positive solutions with a fixed (arbitrary) number of bumps. Finally, the structure of these components is fully described.

Non-negative solutions of a sublinear elliptic problem

Abstract

In this paper the existence of solutions, , of the problem is explored for . When , it is known that there is an unbounded component of such solutions bifurcating from , where is the smallest eigenvalue of in under Dirichlet boundary conditions on . These solutions have , the interior of the positive cone. The continuation argument used when to keep fails if . Nevertheless when , we are still able to show that there is a component of solutions bifurcating from , unbounded outside of a neighborhood of , and having . This non-negativity for cannot be improved as is shown via a detailed analysis of the simplest autonomous one-dimensional version of the problem: its set of non-negative solutions possesses a countable set of components, each of them consisting of positive solutions with a fixed (arbitrary) number of bumps. Finally, the structure of these components is fully described.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 6 theorems, 138 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 6 theorems, 138 equations, 11 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

If 1.2 holds, there is a component, $\mathscr{D}^+$, of the set of nonnegative solutions of 1.1 with $(\sigma_1,\infty)\in \bar{\mathscr{D}}^+ \subset {\mathbb R} \times (\bar{P}\setminus\{0\})$. Moreover, $\mathcal{P}_\lambda(\mathscr{D}^+)= (\sigma_1,\infty)$, and there is a neighborhood, $\hat{O

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: The surface $z=E(u,v)$.
  • Figure 2: Level lines of the energy function. We have highlighted $[E=0]$.
  • Figure 3: Three solutions of \ref{['1.3']}. The simulation is made for the coefficients $\lambda=1,$$a=2$ and $p=1/2.$ For the initial point we have taken $u_H=64/9$ (according to \ref{['3.8']}) and $\varepsilon=1/2.$ All these solutions have their first inflection point at level $u=u_0^+$ (the abscissa of the nontrivial equilibrium point).
  • Figure 4: Five solutions of \ref{['1.3']} having the same extinction time, $T_H$, for $(\lambda,p)$ constant and $a$ varying. The simulation has been made with $\lambda=1$ and $p=1/2$. For the initial point we have taken $(u_H,0)$ (according to \ref{['3.8']}). The solutions have been computed for the following series of values: $a=1$ ($u_H=16/9$), $a=5/4$ ($u_h=16/9$), $a=3/2$ ($u_H=4$), $a=7/4$ ($u_H=49/9$), $a=2$ ($u_H=64/9$).
  • Figure 5: Different atypical homoclinics of system \ref{['3.3']} for a fixed pair $(a,p)$ and different values of $\lambda$. The simulation is made for the coefficients $a=2$ and $p=2/3.$ The values chosen for $\lambda$ vary from $\lambda=1$ the external orbit) to $\lambda=2$ (the smallest orbit).
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (12)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Remark 2.1
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Remark 2.3
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 2 more