Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rational motives on pro-algebraic stacks

Can Yaylali

TL;DR

The paper develops a pro-limit motivated theory of Beilinson rational motives for pro-${\mathcal{I}}$-algebraic stacks, defining $\mathrm{DM}(x,X)$ as a colimit of finite-type motives and establishing a robust motivic six-functor formalism for suitable morphisms in the pro-setting. It provides two complementary constructions to realize the six-functor structure: a general pullback-formalism framework for diagrammatic extensions and a six-functor formalism via adjointability or cartesian correspondences, yielding base-change, projection formulas, homotopy-invariance, localization, and purity. The theory is then applied to the stack of displays $\mathrm{Disp}$, proving its motive is Tate and that $\mathrm{DM}(\mathrm{Disp}) \simeq \mathrm{DM}(\mathrm{Disp}_1)$, with explicit motivic-cohomology calculations in terms of Chow groups; a connection to Barsotti–Tate stacks $\mathrm{BT}$ is also drawn. Finally, the absolute Galois group action on motivic homology is analyzed via pro-systems of finite extensions, yielding a Galois-action interpretation of motivic invariants and a continuous-homotopy-fixed-points perspective on $A^{n}(X,m)_{\mathbb{Q}}$.

Abstract

We define an $\infty$-category of rational motives for inverse limits of algebraic stacks, so-called pro-algebraic stacks. We show that it admits a $6$-functor formalism for certain classes of morphisms. On pro-schemes, we show that this $6$-functor formalism is in the sense of Liu-Zheng. This theory yields an approach to the theory of motives for non-representable algebraic stacks and non-finite type morphisms.

Rational motives on pro-algebraic stacks

TL;DR

The paper develops a pro-limit motivated theory of Beilinson rational motives for pro--algebraic stacks, defining as a colimit of finite-type motives and establishing a robust motivic six-functor formalism for suitable morphisms in the pro-setting. It provides two complementary constructions to realize the six-functor structure: a general pullback-formalism framework for diagrammatic extensions and a six-functor formalism via adjointability or cartesian correspondences, yielding base-change, projection formulas, homotopy-invariance, localization, and purity. The theory is then applied to the stack of displays , proving its motive is Tate and that , with explicit motivic-cohomology calculations in terms of Chow groups; a connection to Barsotti–Tate stacks is also drawn. Finally, the absolute Galois group action on motivic homology is analyzed via pro-systems of finite extensions, yielding a Galois-action interpretation of motivic invariants and a continuous-homotopy-fixed-points perspective on .

Abstract

We define an -category of rational motives for inverse limits of algebraic stacks, so-called pro-algebraic stacks. We show that it admits a -functor formalism for certain classes of morphisms. On pro-schemes, we show that this -functor formalism is in the sense of Liu-Zheng. This theory yields an approach to the theory of motives for non-representable algebraic stacks and non-finite type morphisms.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 22 theorems, 77 equations)

This paper contains 11 sections, 22 theorems, 77 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3

The $\infty$-category $\textup{DM}(x,X)$ is closed symmetric monoidal, compactly generated and the assignment $(x,X)\mapsto \textup{DM}(x,X)$ is contravariantly functorial in $(x,X)$. Let $f\colon (x,X)\rightarrow (y,Y)$ be a morphisms of tame pro-$\mathbb{N}$-algebraic stacks that is levelwise loca

Theorems & Definitions (75)

  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2
  • Theorem 3: \ref{['thm.6-ff']}
  • Theorem 4: \ref{['thm-Disp']}
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Example 2.7
  • ...and 65 more