Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Shorts vs. Regular Videos on YouTube: A Comparative Analysis of User Engagement and Content Creation Trends

Caroline Violot, Tuğrulcan Elmas, Igor Bilogrevic, Mathias Humbert

TL;DR

The first comparative analysis of YouTube Shorts versus regular videos with respect to user engagement, content creation frequency and video categories is presented, showing that Shorts attract more views and likes per view than regular videos, but attract less comments per view.

Abstract

YouTube introduced the Shorts video format in 2021, allowing users to upload short videos that are prominently displayed on its website and app. Despite having such a large visual footprint, there are no studies to date that have looked at the impact Shorts introduction had on the production and consumption of content on YouTube. This paper presents the first comparative analysis of YouTube Shorts versus regular videos with respect to user engagement (i.e., views, likes, and comments), content creation frequency and video categories. We collected a dataset containing information about 70k channels that posted at least one Short, and we analyzed the metadata of all the videos (9.9M Shorts and 6.9M regular videos) they uploaded between January 2021 and December 2022, spanning a two-year period including the introduction of Shorts. Our longitudinal analysis shows that content creators consistently increased the frequency of Shorts production over this period, especially for newly-created channels, which surpassed that of regular videos. We also observe that Shorts target mostly entertainment categories, while regular videos cover a wide variety of categories. In general, Shorts attract more views and likes per view than regular videos, but attract less comments per view. However, Shorts do not outperform regular videos in the education and political categories as much as they do in other categories. Our study contributes to understanding social media dynamics, to quantifying the spread of short-form content, and to motivating future research on its impact on society.

Shorts vs. Regular Videos on YouTube: A Comparative Analysis of User Engagement and Content Creation Trends

TL;DR

The first comparative analysis of YouTube Shorts versus regular videos with respect to user engagement, content creation frequency and video categories is presented, showing that Shorts attract more views and likes per view than regular videos, but attract less comments per view.

Abstract

YouTube introduced the Shorts video format in 2021, allowing users to upload short videos that are prominently displayed on its website and app. Despite having such a large visual footprint, there are no studies to date that have looked at the impact Shorts introduction had on the production and consumption of content on YouTube. This paper presents the first comparative analysis of YouTube Shorts versus regular videos with respect to user engagement (i.e., views, likes, and comments), content creation frequency and video categories. We collected a dataset containing information about 70k channels that posted at least one Short, and we analyzed the metadata of all the videos (9.9M Shorts and 6.9M regular videos) they uploaded between January 2021 and December 2022, spanning a two-year period including the introduction of Shorts. Our longitudinal analysis shows that content creators consistently increased the frequency of Shorts production over this period, especially for newly-created channels, which surpassed that of regular videos. We also observe that Shorts target mostly entertainment categories, while regular videos cover a wide variety of categories. In general, Shorts attract more views and likes per view than regular videos, but attract less comments per view. However, Shorts do not outperform regular videos in the education and political categories as much as they do in other categories. Our study contributes to understanding social media dynamics, to quantifying the spread of short-form content, and to motivating future research on its impact on society.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 29 sections, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Data collection process summary.
  • Figure 2: Weekly video uploads, categorized into Shorts and RVs, with the number of channels older than the respective week shown in light grey. Some videos created before the introduction of Shorts were retrospectively classified as Shorts.
  • Figure 3: Analysis of channels' posting activity from January 2021 to December 2022. Channels were divided into groups based on the percentage of Shorts in the videos uploaded each week. The evolution of the fractions of channels in each group is shown.
  • Figure 4: Evolution of normalized uploads frequency. Average weekly uploads of Shorts and RVs of each channel normalized by the total number videos (of both types) posted by that channel.
  • Figure 5: Evolution of normalized weekly content volume. Average over all channels of the weekly content volume (sum of the durations of each video posted that week), separated between Shorts and RVs, normalized by the combined weekly content volume of both types.
  • ...and 4 more figures