Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rigorously proven chaos in chemical kinetics

M. Susits, J. Tóth

Abstract

This study addresses a longstanding question regarding the mathematical proof of chaotic behavior in kinetic differential equations. Following the numerous numerical and experimental results in the past 50 years, we introduce two formal chemical reactions that rigorously demonstrate this behavior. Our approach involves transforming chaotic equations into kinetic differential equations and subsequently realizing these equations through formal chemical reactions. The findings present a novel perspective on chaotic dynamics within chemical kinetics, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem.

Rigorously proven chaos in chemical kinetics

Abstract

This study addresses a longstanding question regarding the mathematical proof of chaotic behavior in kinetic differential equations. Following the numerous numerical and experimental results in the past 50 years, we introduce two formal chemical reactions that rigorously demonstrate this behavior. Our approach involves transforming chaotic equations into kinetic differential equations and subsequently realizing these equations through formal chemical reactions. The findings present a novel perspective on chaotic dynamics within chemical kinetics, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 2 theorems, 25 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 2 theorems, 25 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For any $Z_0 \leq 0$ and $U_0 \geq U_{0,\min}$ consider the ellipsoids $i=0,1,2,\dots$ where for $i \geq 1$ with $B>A/(A-Z_0)$. In the upper half-space $H_i:Z>Z_i$ let $\Omega_i=E^V_i\cap H_i$ where $E^V_i$ is the region embraced by $E_i$. Moreover for $N\geq 0$ define Then, there exists a non-negative integer $N$ such that $\Omega_{0,1,\dots,N}$ is a trapping region. The value of $N$ is determi

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: $D: 28x^2 + y^2 + \frac{8}{3}(z-28)^2 = \frac{6272}{3}$ and $E : 28x^2 + 10 y^2 + 10(z - 56)^2 = 200^2$
  • Figure 2: Time evolution of the first component in the Lorenz equation with the parameters as given in the text (left) and the corresponding trajectory (right) started from $(1,2,3)$ on the time interval 0-50.
  • Figure 3: Time evolution of the first component in the transformed Lorenz reaction (left) and the corresponding trajectory (right) started from $(101,102,13)$ on the time interval 0-0.00012.
  • Figure 4: The Feinberg--Horn--Jackson graph of the reaction \ref{['eq:lorenz01']}--\ref{['eq:lorenz06']}.
  • Figure 5: Time evolution of the first component in the Chen equation with the parameters as given in the text (left) and the corresponding trajectory (right) started from $(3,1,4)$ on the time interval 0-13.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Proposition 1
  • Lemma 1
  • Definition 1: Canonic realization
  • Definition 2: Devaney
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4: Smale, horseshoe
  • Definition 5: Smith, topological entropy
  • Definition 6
  • Definition 7: Physics, Lyapunov
  • Definition 8: Period doubling