Tighter Bounds for Local Differentially Private Core Decomposition and Densest Subgraph
Monika Henzinger, A. R. Sricharan, Leqi Zhu
TL;DR
This work advances privacy-preserving graph analysis by establishing tight additive-error lower bounds for core decomposition in centralized models and 1-round local models, and by delivering local mechanisms with near-optimal accuracy. The authors introduce continual counting-based peeling to implement private core computations, enabling memoryless and memoryful local algorithms that achieve exact or near-exact core decompositions with additive errors polynomial in $\log n$ and $\log \Delta$. They also show that these core-decomposition results translate to densest-subgraph guarantees via reductions, yielding improved local-private densest-subgraph mechanisms. Finally, the paper delineates memory versus nonmemory trade-offs and lays groundwork for future separations between local memory regimes. Overall, the results tighten the known privacy-accuracy trade-offs in the local model and provide practical, near-optimal tools for privacy-preserving graph analysis.
Abstract
Computing the core decomposition of a graph is a fundamental problem that has recently been studied in the differentially private setting, motivated by practical applications in data mining. In particular, Dhulipala et al. [FOCS 2022] gave the first mechanism for approximate core decomposition in the challenging and practically relevant setting of local differential privacy. One of the main open problems left by their work is whether the accuracy, i.e., the approximation ratio and additive error, of their mechanism can be improved. We show the first lower bounds on the additive error of approximate and exact core decomposition mechanisms in the centralized and local model of differential privacy, respectively. We also give mechanisms for exact and approximate core decomposition in the local model, with almost matching additive error bounds. Our mechanisms are based on a black-box application of continual counting. They also yield improved mechanisms for the approximate densest subgraph problem in the local model.
