Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A $p$-version of convolution quadrature in wave propagation

Alexander Rieder

Abstract

We consider a novel way of discretizing wave scattering problems using the general formalism of convolution quadrature, but instead of reducing the timestep size ($h$-method), we achieve accuracy by increasing the order of the method ($p$-method). We base this method on discontinuous Galerkin timestepping and use the Z-transform. We show that for a certain class of incident waves, the resulting schemes observes(root)-exponential convergence rate with respect to the number of boundary integral operators that need to be applied. Numerical experiments confirm the findings.

A $p$-version of convolution quadrature in wave propagation

Abstract

We consider a novel way of discretizing wave scattering problems using the general formalism of convolution quadrature, but instead of reducing the timestep size (-method), we achieve accuracy by increasing the order of the method (-method). We base this method on discontinuous Galerkin timestepping and use the Z-transform. We show that for a certain class of incident waves, the resulting schemes observes(root)-exponential convergence rate with respect to the number of boundary integral operators that need to be applied. Numerical experiments confirm the findings.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 27 theorems, 130 equations, 4 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 22 sections, 27 theorems, 130 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Proposition 2.2

Assume that we are in one of the following cases: Then the function $u$ defined by the potentials satisfies the model problem eq:wave_eqn_classic.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 7.1: Numerical investigation of $\sigma(\boldsymbol \delta(z)/h)$
  • Figure 8.1: Convergence for the scalar model problem using different windowing functions
  • Figure 8.2: Geometry and solution for the $3d$ example
  • Figure 8.3: Convergence for the $3d$ scattering problem

Theorems & Definitions (64)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Proposition 3.1: SS00b
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof
  • Remark 4.1
  • ...and 54 more