Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gilbert-Varshamov Bound for Codes in $L_1$ Metric using Multivariate Analytic Combinatorics

Keshav Goyal, Duc Tu Dao, Mladen Kovačević, Han Mao Kiah

TL;DR

These tools are applied to determine the Gilbert-Varshamov lower bound on the rate of optimal codes in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$L_{1}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> metric.

Abstract

Analytic combinatorics in several variables refers to a suite of tools that provide sharp asymptotic estimates for certain combinatorial quantities. In this paper, we apply these tools to determine the Gilbert--Varshamov lower bound on the rate of optimal codes in $L_1$ metric. Several different code spaces are analyzed, including the simplex and the hypercube in $\mathbb{Z^n}$, all of which are inspired by concrete data storage and transmission models such as the sticky insertion channel, the permutation channel, the adjacent transposition (bit-shift) channel, the multilevel flash memory channel, etc.

Gilbert-Varshamov Bound for Codes in $L_1$ Metric using Multivariate Analytic Combinatorics

TL;DR

These tools are applied to determine the Gilbert-Varshamov lower bound on the rate of optimal codes in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX"> </tex-math></inline-formula> metric.

Abstract

Analytic combinatorics in several variables refers to a suite of tools that provide sharp asymptotic estimates for certain combinatorial quantities. In this paper, we apply these tools to determine the Gilbert--Varshamov lower bound on the rate of optimal codes in metric. Several different code spaces are analyzed, including the simplex and the hypercube in , all of which are inspired by concrete data storage and transmission models such as the sticky insertion channel, the permutation channel, the adjacent transposition (bit-shift) channel, the multilevel flash memory channel, etc.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 43 theorems, 157 equations, 3 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 22 sections, 43 theorems, 157 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $F(\mathbfsl{z}) = \sum_{\mathbfsl{k}}a_{\mathbfsl{k}} \mathbfsl{z}^\mathbfsl{k}= \frac{G(\mathbfsl{z})}{H(\mathbfsl{z})}$ where $G$ and $H$ are both analytic, $H(\mathbf{0}) \neq 0$, and $a_{\mathbfsl{k}} > 0$. For each $\mathbfsl{k}= (k_1,k_2,\ldots k_\ell)>\mathbf{0}$ there is a unique soluti Furthermore, if $G(\mathbfsl{z}^*) \neq 0$, where $\mathtt{H}$ is the determinant of the Hessian o

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Bounds on the highest attainable code rate $\alpha(\Delta_{2},\delta)$ for the standard simplex ($\rho=2$).
  • Figure 2: Lower bounds on the highest attainable code rate for the positive simplex and the inverted simplex.
  • Figure 3: Lower bounds on the highest attainable code rate $\alpha({\mathbb Z}_{4},\delta)$ for the family of hypercubes $\{{\mathbb Z}^n_{4}\}_n$.

Theorems & Definitions (78)

  • Theorem 1: pemantle2008
  • Example 1: Binomial coefficients pemantle2008
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3
  • proof
  • Example 2: Example \ref{['exa:binomial']} continued
  • Corollary 4
  • proof
  • Proposition 5
  • ...and 68 more