Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Stack Representation of Finitely Presented Heyting Pretoposes I

Lingyuan Ye

Abstract

This is the first of a series of papers on stack representation of finitely presented Heyting pretoposes. In this paper, we provide the first step by constructing a (2, 1)-site, which can be thought of as the site of finite Kripke frames, such that the (2,1)-category of finitely presented Heyting pretoposes contravariantly embeds into the (2,1)- topos of stacks on this (2, 1)-site. This provides an entry point to use categorical and higher sheaf-theoretic tools to study the properties of certain classes of intuitionistic first-order theories.

Stack Representation of Finitely Presented Heyting Pretoposes I

Abstract

This is the first of a series of papers on stack representation of finitely presented Heyting pretoposes. In this paper, we provide the first step by constructing a (2, 1)-site, which can be thought of as the site of finite Kripke frames, such that the (2,1)-category of finitely presented Heyting pretoposes contravariantly embeds into the (2,1)- topos of stacks on this (2, 1)-site. This provides an entry point to use categorical and higher sheaf-theoretic tools to study the properties of certain classes of intuitionistic first-order theories.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 31 theorems, 85 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 31 theorems, 85 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

For any pretopos $\mathcal{D}$, its category of models $\mathrm{Mod}(\mathcal{D})$ is closed under filtered colimits in $[\mathcal{D},\mathbf{Set}]$, thus in particular is Cauchy complete.

Theorems & Definitions (74)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.5
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.6
  • ...and 64 more