On the monograph "Finiteness Theorems for limit cycles" and a special case of alternant cycles
Melvin Yeung
Abstract
We provide evidence that the approach of [Ilyashenko 1991] to the proof of Dulac's theorem has a gap. Although the asymptotics of [Ilyashenko 1991] capture far more than the asymptotics of Dulac, we prove that the arguments for why the asymptotics in [Ilyashenko 1991] are not themselves oscillatory is insufficient. We give an explicit counterexample and we draw confines to which Ilyashenko's result may be restricted in order to keep the validity.
