Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the monograph "Finiteness Theorems for limit cycles" and a special case of alternant cycles

Melvin Yeung

Abstract

We provide evidence that the approach of [Ilyashenko 1991] to the proof of Dulac's theorem has a gap. Although the asymptotics of [Ilyashenko 1991] capture far more than the asymptotics of Dulac, we prove that the arguments for why the asymptotics in [Ilyashenko 1991] are not themselves oscillatory is insufficient. We give an explicit counterexample and we draw confines to which Ilyashenko's result may be restricted in order to keep the validity.

On the monograph "Finiteness Theorems for limit cycles" and a special case of alternant cycles

Abstract

We provide evidence that the approach of [Ilyashenko 1991] to the proof of Dulac's theorem has a gap. Although the asymptotics of [Ilyashenko 1991] capture far more than the asymptotics of Dulac, we prove that the arguments for why the asymptotics in [Ilyashenko 1991] are not themselves oscillatory is insufficient. We give an explicit counterexample and we draw confines to which Ilyashenko's result may be restricted in order to keep the validity.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 2 theorems, 70 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 15 sections, 2 theorems, 70 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 4.1

Let $A$ stand for conjugation by $\exp$, i.e.: All Dulac maps of the polycycles we study are contained in:

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Decomposition of a first return map of a simple alternant polycycle. The arrows on the separatrices are double for a hyperbolic separatrix and single for a center separatrix.
  • Figure 2: Counterexample notation

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Conjecture 1.1
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • Theorem 4.1: Structural Theorem, specific case
  • Remark 4.2
  • Remark 4.3
  • Definition 4.4
  • Remark 4.5
  • Remark 4.6
  • ...and 6 more