Logo
ScienceStack
Table of Contents
Fetching ...
Sign In

Regularized double shuffle relations of $μ$-multiple Hurwitz zeta values

Jia Li, Jianqiang Zhao

Abstract

In this paper we consider a family of multiple Hurwitz zeta values with bi-indices parameterized by $μ$ with $\Ree(μ)>0$. These values are equipped with both the $μ$-stuffle product from their series definition and the shuffle product from their integral expressions. We will give a detailed analysis of the two different products and discuss their regularization when the bi-indices are non-admissible. Our main goal is to prove the comparison theorem relating the two ways of regularization, which is an analog of Ihara, Kaneko, and Zagier's celebrated result concerning the regularization of multiple zeta values. We will see that the comparison formula is $μ$-invariant, that is, it is independent of the parameter $μ$. As applications, we will first provide a few interesting closed formulas for some multi-fold infinite sums that are closely related to the multiple zeta values of level $N$ studied by Yuan and the second author. We will also derive two sum formulas for $μ$-double Hurwitz zeta values which generalize the sum formulas for double zeta values and double zeta star values, respectively, and a weighted sum formula which generalizes the weighted sum formulas for both double zeta values and double $T$-values simultaneously. At the end of the paper, we will propose a problem extending that for multiple zeta values first conjectured by Ihara et al.

Regularized double shuffle relations of $μ$-multiple Hurwitz zeta values

Abstract

In this paper we consider a family of multiple Hurwitz zeta values with bi-indices parameterized by with . These values are equipped with both the -stuffle product from their series definition and the shuffle product from their integral expressions. We will give a detailed analysis of the two different products and discuss their regularization when the bi-indices are non-admissible. Our main goal is to prove the comparison theorem relating the two ways of regularization, which is an analog of Ihara, Kaneko, and Zagier's celebrated result concerning the regularization of multiple zeta values. We will see that the comparison formula is -invariant, that is, it is independent of the parameter . As applications, we will first provide a few interesting closed formulas for some multi-fold infinite sums that are closely related to the multiple zeta values of level studied by Yuan and the second author. We will also derive two sum formulas for -double Hurwitz zeta values which generalize the sum formulas for double zeta values and double zeta star values, respectively, and a weighted sum formula which generalizes the weighted sum formulas for both double zeta values and double -values simultaneously. At the end of the paper, we will propose a problem extending that for multiple zeta values first conjectured by Ihara et al.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 58 theorems, 383 equations, 1 table)

This paper contains 19 sections, 58 theorems, 383 equations, 1 table.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Multiple zeta values and some variants
  3. $\mu$-multiple Hurwitz zeta values
  4. $\mu$-stuffle and shuffle products and regularization
  5. Comparison theorems
  6. Algebraic structures on ${\mathcal{Z}}^{\mu}$
  7. The $\mu$-stuffle product on ${\mathcal{Z}}^{\mu}$
  8. Integral representation and shuffle product on ${\mathcal{Z}}^{\mu}$
  9. Bi-indices and binary sequences
  10. Word algebra of $\mu$-multiple Hurwitz zeta values
  11. Word algebra for $\mu$-stuffle product
  12. Admissible words for $\mu$-stuffle product
  13. Word algebra for shuffle product
  14. Regularization homomorphisms and comparison theorems
  15. Regularization homomorphisms for $\mu$-stuffle product
  16. ...and 4 more sections

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

(Integral representation) Let $({\boldsymbol{k}};{\boldsymbol{m}})$ be an admissible bi-index. Then we have the following integral representation for $\mu$-MHZVs: For quasi-$\mu$-MHZVs, we have for any special triple $({\boldsymbol{k}};{\boldsymbol{m}};{\widetilde{{\boldsymbol{m}}}})$

Theorems & Definitions (147)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Remark 1.8
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • ...and 137 more