Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Brill-Noether loci and strata of differentials

Andrei Bud

Abstract

We prove that the projectivized strata of differentials are not contained in pointed Brill-Noether divisors, with only a few exceptions. For a generic element in a stratum of differentials, we show that many of the associated pointed Brill-Noether loci are of expected dimension. We use our results to study the Auel-Haburcak Conjecture: We obtain new non-containments between maximal Brill-Noether loci in $\mathcal{M}_g$. Our results regarding quadratic differentials imply that the quadratic strata in genus $6$ are uniruled.

Brill-Noether loci and strata of differentials

Abstract

We prove that the projectivized strata of differentials are not contained in pointed Brill-Noether divisors, with only a few exceptions. For a generic element in a stratum of differentials, we show that many of the associated pointed Brill-Noether loci are of expected dimension. We use our results to study the Auel-Haburcak Conjecture: We obtain new non-containments between maximal Brill-Noether loci in . Our results regarding quadratic differentials imply that the quadratic strata in genus are uniruled.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 20 theorems, 102 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 20 theorems, 102 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $r\geq 1$, $g\geq r+2$ be natural numbers and $a = (0\leq a_0<a_1<\cdots a_r \leq g+r)$ a vanishing sequence satisfying and $a_r\leq g$. Then, if $[C,p]$ is generic in the stratum $\mathcal{H}_g^{\textrm{odd}}(2g-2)$, it does not admit a $g^r_{g+r}$ with prescribed vanishing $a$ at $p$.

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • ...and 22 more