Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On dp-minimal expansions of the integers II

Eran Alouf

Abstract

We first prove that if $\mathcal{Z}$ is a dp-minimal expansion of $\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1\right)$ which is not interdefinable with $\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1,<\right)$, then every infinite subset of $\mathbb{Z}$ definable in $\mathcal{Z}$ is generic in $\mathbb{Z}$. Using this, we prove that if $\mathcal{Z}$ is a dp-minimal expansion of $\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1\right)$ with monster model $G$ such that $G^{00}\neq G^{0}$, then for some $α\in\mathbb{R}\backslash\mathbb{Q}$, the cyclic order on $\mathbb{Z}$ induced by the embedding $n\mapsto nα+\mathbb{Z}$ of $\mathbb{Z}$ in $\mathbb{R}\big/\mathbb{Z}$ is definable in $\mathcal{Z}$. The proof employs the Gleason-Yamabe theorem for abelian groups.

On dp-minimal expansions of the integers II

Abstract

We first prove that if is a dp-minimal expansion of which is not interdefinable with , then every infinite subset of definable in is generic in . Using this, we prove that if is a dp-minimal expansion of with monster model such that , then for some , the cyclic order on induced by the embedding of in is definable in . The proof employs the Gleason-Yamabe theorem for abelian groups.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 27 theorems, 13 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 27 theorems, 13 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $\mathcal{Z}$ be a dp-minimal expansion of $\left(\mathbb{Z},+,0,1\right)$, and let $G$ be a monster model. Suppose that $G^{00}\neq G^{0}$. Then for some $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\backslash\mathbb{Q}$, $C_{\alpha}$ is definable in $\mathcal{Z}$.

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • Conjecture 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.6
  • Remark 2.7
  • Definition 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • ...and 69 more