Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Border subrank via a generalised Hilbert-Mumford criterion

Benjamin Biaggi, Chia-Yu Chang, Jan Draisma, Filip Rupniewski

TL;DR

The paper investigates the generic border subrank of order-$d$ tensors and proves an upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(n^{1/(d-1)})$ as the ambient dimension $n$ grows, aligning with the known generic subrank growth and highlighting a divergence between border subrank and subrank at large $n$. The approach hinges on a generalised Hilbert-Mumford criterion derived via a Cartan-Iwahori-Matsumoto decomposition in loop groups, combined with constructibility arguments and a dimension-counting framework based on a weight-incidence variety. The authors establish constructibility of border-subrank loci, derive a precise dimension bound (in terms of $s=\lfloor r/d\rfloor$) for $X_{\ge r}$, and then deduce the $O(n^{1/(d-1)})$ growth. For $d=3$ they further prove a matching lower bound up to constants and show the generic border subrank strictly exceeds the generic subrank for large $n$, underscoring non-coincidence of these invariants. The work advances invariant-theoretic methods for tensor complexity and introduces tools potentially useful beyond border subrank, including a broader Hilbert-Mumford-type criterion.

Abstract

We show that the border subrank of a sufficiently general tensor in $(\mathbb{C}^n)^{\otimes d}$ is $\mathcal{O}(n^{1/(d-1)})$ for $n \to \infty$. Since this matches the growth rate $Θ(n^{1/(d-1)})$ for the generic (non-border) subrank recently established by Derksen-Makam-Zuiddam, we find that the generic border subrank has the same growth rate. In our proof, we use a generalisation of the Hilbert-Mumford criterion that we believe will be of independent interest.

Border subrank via a generalised Hilbert-Mumford criterion

TL;DR

The paper investigates the generic border subrank of order- tensors and proves an upper bound of as the ambient dimension grows, aligning with the known generic subrank growth and highlighting a divergence between border subrank and subrank at large . The approach hinges on a generalised Hilbert-Mumford criterion derived via a Cartan-Iwahori-Matsumoto decomposition in loop groups, combined with constructibility arguments and a dimension-counting framework based on a weight-incidence variety. The authors establish constructibility of border-subrank loci, derive a precise dimension bound (in terms of ) for , and then deduce the growth. For they further prove a matching lower bound up to constants and show the generic border subrank strictly exceeds the generic subrank for large , underscoring non-coincidence of these invariants. The work advances invariant-theoretic methods for tensor complexity and introduces tools potentially useful beyond border subrank, including a broader Hilbert-Mumford-type criterion.

Abstract

We show that the border subrank of a sufficiently general tensor in is for . Since this matches the growth rate for the generic (non-border) subrank recently established by Derksen-Makam-Zuiddam, we find that the generic border subrank has the same growth rate. In our proof, we use a generalisation of the Hilbert-Mumford criterion that we believe will be of independent interest.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 8 theorems, 50 equations, 2 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 8 theorems, 50 equations, 2 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For any $d,r,V_1,\ldots,V_d$, the set $X_r \subseteq V_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes V_d$ of tensors of border subrank precisely $r$ is a constructible set. Therefore, the same holds for the sets $X_{<r}$ and $X_{\geq r}$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: The pyramid $P$ seen from above along the $l$-axis. On the orange corners we have $a_{1j}+a_{2k}+a_{3l}=0$, and on the red positions (and below these and the orange corners) we have $a_{1j}+a_{2k}+a_{3l}<0$.
  • Figure 2: The pyramid $P$ in red and orange for $r=4$, and the support of the additional full-rank matrices in $\tilde{T}$ in green.

Theorems & Definitions (20)

  • Proposition 1
  • Theorem 2: Main Theorem
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['prop:Constructible']}
  • Theorem 5
  • proof
  • Proposition 6
  • proof
  • Example 7
  • ...and 10 more