Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A possible late-time transition of $M_B$ inferred via neural networks

Purba Mukherjee, Konstantinos F. Dialektopoulos, Jackson Levi Said, Jurgen Mifsud

Abstract

The strengthening of tensions in the cosmological parameters has led to a reconsideration of fundamental aspects of standard cosmology. The tension in the Hubble constant can also be viewed as a tension between local and early Universe constraints on the absolute magnitude $M_B$ of Type Ia supernova. In this work, we reconsider the possibility of a variation of this parameter in a model-independent way. We employ neural networks to agnostically constrain the value of the absolute magnitude as well as assess the impact and statistical significance of a variation in $M_B$ with redshift from the Pantheon+ compilation, together with a thorough analysis of the neural network architecture. We find an indication for a possible transition redshift at the $z\approx 1$ region.

A possible late-time transition of $M_B$ inferred via neural networks

Abstract

The strengthening of tensions in the cosmological parameters has led to a reconsideration of fundamental aspects of standard cosmology. The tension in the Hubble constant can also be viewed as a tension between local and early Universe constraints on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernova. In this work, we reconsider the possibility of a variation of this parameter in a model-independent way. We employ neural networks to agnostically constrain the value of the absolute magnitude as well as assess the impact and statistical significance of a variation in with redshift from the Pantheon+ compilation, together with a thorough analysis of the neural network architecture. We find an indication for a possible transition redshift at the region.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 10 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 11 sections, 10 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: The adopted ANN architecture is shown, where the input is the redshift of a cosmological parameter $\Upsilon(z)$, and the outputs are the corresponding value and error of $\Upsilon(z)$.
  • Figure 2: Plots illustrating the evolution of training loss and validation loss across different epochs (left panel). ANN reconstruction of the Pantheon+ SNIa apparent magnitudes $m(z)$ as a function of the redshift $(z)$.
  • Figure 3: ANN reconstruction of the Pantheon+ apparent magnitudes $m(z)$ (left panel) and its corresponding derivatives $m^{\prime}(z)$ [right panel] at the CC redshifts $(z_{\text{CC}})$.
  • Figure 4: Normalized covariance matrices between ANN reconstruction of the Pantheon+ SN-Ia apparent magnitudes $m(z)$ and its corresponding derivatives $m^{\prime}(z)$ at the CC redshifts $(z_{\text{CC}})$.
  • Figure 5: Marginalized posteriors of supernovae apparent magnitude $M_B$ as a function of the number of considered ANN reconstructions. The obtained constraints obtained are $M_B$ = $-19.352^{+0.073}_{-0.079}$, $-19.352^{+0.073}_{-0.079}$, $-19.353^{+0.073}_{-0.078}$, $-19.353^{+0.073}_{-0.078}$, and $-19.353^{+0.073}_{-0.078}$, corresponding to 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ANN reconstructions.
  • ...and 4 more figures