Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Repurposing Coal Power Plants into Thermal Energy Storage for Supporting Zero-carbon Data Centers

Yifu Ding, Serena Patel, Dharik Mallapragada, Robert James Stoner

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of decarbonizing power systems while maintaining reliability by proposing an integrated capacity-expansion model that co-optimizes retrofitted molten-salt thermal energy storage (TES), lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), co-located zero-carbon data centers (DCs), and local renewables, under hourly carbon-matching constraints and DC workload flexibility. Using a case study anchored in the ERCOT system, the authors examine retrofitting 12 coal plants near Texas DC sites and deploying three 1 GW DCs by 2030, with detailed TES and LIB cost parameters. Key findings show that retrofitted TES can complement LIBs to lower system costs under carbon constraints, while zero-carbon DCs require more renewable capacity but can outperform unconstrained DCs in certain scenarios, achieving 13–23% carbon reduction. The work demonstrates a viable pathway to reuse existing coal assets and grid interconnections to accelerate data-center decarbonization and broader renewable integration.

Abstract

Coal power plants will need to be phased out and face stranded asset risks under the net-zero energy system transition. Repurposing coal power plants could recoup profits and reduce carbon emissions using the existing infrastructure and grid connections. This paper investigates a retrofitting strategy that turns coal power plants into thermal energy storage (TES) and zero-carbon data centers (DCs). The proposed capacity expansion model considers the co-locations of DCs, local renewablewith the system-generation, andlevel coal retir energy storage ement and retrofitting. We optimize the DC system configurations under the hourly-matching carbon policy and flexible operations. Results show that under hourly-matching carbon constraints, the retrofitted TES could complement the operations of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) to reduce system costs. This could render DCs with optimal co-located renewable generations and energy storage more cost-effective than unconstrained DCs.

Repurposing Coal Power Plants into Thermal Energy Storage for Supporting Zero-carbon Data Centers

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of decarbonizing power systems while maintaining reliability by proposing an integrated capacity-expansion model that co-optimizes retrofitted molten-salt thermal energy storage (TES), lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), co-located zero-carbon data centers (DCs), and local renewables, under hourly carbon-matching constraints and DC workload flexibility. Using a case study anchored in the ERCOT system, the authors examine retrofitting 12 coal plants near Texas DC sites and deploying three 1 GW DCs by 2030, with detailed TES and LIB cost parameters. Key findings show that retrofitted TES can complement LIBs to lower system costs under carbon constraints, while zero-carbon DCs require more renewable capacity but can outperform unconstrained DCs in certain scenarios, achieving 13–23% carbon reduction. The work demonstrates a viable pathway to reuse existing coal assets and grid interconnections to accelerate data-center decarbonization and broader renewable integration.

Abstract

Coal power plants will need to be phased out and face stranded asset risks under the net-zero energy system transition. Repurposing coal power plants could recoup profits and reduce carbon emissions using the existing infrastructure and grid connections. This paper investigates a retrofitting strategy that turns coal power plants into thermal energy storage (TES) and zero-carbon data centers (DCs). The proposed capacity expansion model considers the co-locations of DCs, local renewablewith the system-generation, andlevel coal retir energy storage ement and retrofitting. We optimize the DC system configurations under the hourly-matching carbon policy and flexible operations. Results show that under hourly-matching carbon constraints, the retrofitted TES could complement the operations of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) to reduce system costs. This could render DCs with optimal co-located renewable generations and energy storage more cost-effective than unconstrained DCs.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 15 equations, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 11 sections, 15 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: The locations of (a) operating coal plants of three weather zones highlighted in red us_energy_information_administration_coal-fired_nodate and (b) the existing DCs baxtel_texas_nodate as of 2022 in Texas
  • Figure 2: The annualized investment costs for charging, discharging, and energy capacity of the retrofitted TES considering the remaining lifetime of 12 eligible coal power plants by 2030
  • Figure 3: Changes in power capacity (GW) in five scenarios compared to the 2030 ERCOT system without the additional DC loads and coal retrofitting
  • Figure 4: The map of individual retrofitting results in scenario (a) zero-carbon DCs with retrofitted TES, LIB, and co-located renewable generations; DCs are assumed co-located with retrofitted TES
  • Figure 5: Energy storage cycle and renewable generation profiles of two scenarios (a) TES & LIB zero-carbon DC systems (b) LIB zero-carbon DC systems; Battery discharging power is positive, and charging power is negative
  • ...and 2 more figures