Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Improved Deterministic Distributed Maximum Weight Independent Set Approximation in Sparse Graphs

Yuval Gil

TL;DR

This work delivers deterministic CONGEST algorithms for MWIS in sparse graphs by introducing Sparse_Set, a primal-dual–driven procedure powered by β-bounded colorings and arbdefective colorings. The authors obtain a spectrum of approximation guarantees tied to arboricity α and, separately, to maximum degree Δ, including Δ(1+ε)-, ⌊(2+ε)·α⌋-, and α^{1+τ}-type approximations, with runtimes ranging from O(α log n) to O(log α log n) in various regimes. They also extend the approach to directed graphs with out-degree d, achieving a 2d²-approximation in O(d²+log^* n) rounds. Overall, the results advance deterministic MWIS approximations in CONGEST for bounded-arboricity families, offering practical benefits for planar, minor-free, and similarly sparse networks.

Abstract

We design new deterministic CONGEST approximation algorithms for \emph{maximum weight independent set (MWIS)} in \emph{sparse graphs}. As our main results, we obtain new $Δ(1+ε)$-approximation algorithms as well as algorithms whose approximation ratio depend strictly on $α$, in graphs with maximum degree $Δ$ and arboricity $α$. For (deterministic) $Δ(1+ε)$-approximation, the current state-of-the-art is due to a recent breakthrough by Faour et al.\ [SODA 2023] that showed an $O(\log^{2} (ΔW)\cdot \log (1/ε)+\log ^{*}n)$-round algorithm, where $W$ is the largest node-weight (this bound translates to $O(\log^{2} n\cdot\log (1/ε))$ under the common assumption that $W=\text{poly}(n)$). As for $α$-dependent approximations, a deterministic CONGEST $(8(1+ε)\cdotα)$-approximation algorithm with runtime $O(\log^{3} n\cdot\log (1/ε))$ can be derived by combining the aforementioned algorithm of Faour et al.\ with a method presented by Kawarabayashi et al.\ [DISC 2020].

Improved Deterministic Distributed Maximum Weight Independent Set Approximation in Sparse Graphs

TL;DR

This work delivers deterministic CONGEST algorithms for MWIS in sparse graphs by introducing Sparse_Set, a primal-dual–driven procedure powered by β-bounded colorings and arbdefective colorings. The authors obtain a spectrum of approximation guarantees tied to arboricity α and, separately, to maximum degree Δ, including Δ(1+ε)-, ⌊(2+ε)·α⌋-, and α^{1+τ}-type approximations, with runtimes ranging from O(α log n) to O(log α log n) in various regimes. They also extend the approach to directed graphs with out-degree d, achieving a 2d²-approximation in O(d²+log^* n) rounds. Overall, the results advance deterministic MWIS approximations in CONGEST for bounded-arboricity families, offering practical benefits for planar, minor-free, and similarly sparse networks.

Abstract

We design new deterministic CONGEST approximation algorithms for \emph{maximum weight independent set (MWIS)} in \emph{sparse graphs}. As our main results, we obtain new -approximation algorithms as well as algorithms whose approximation ratio depend strictly on , in graphs with maximum degree and arboricity . For (deterministic) -approximation, the current state-of-the-art is due to a recent breakthrough by Faour et al.\ [SODA 2023] that showed an -round algorithm, where is the largest node-weight (this bound translates to under the common assumption that ). As for -dependent approximations, a deterministic CONGEST -approximation algorithm with runtime can be derived by combining the aforementioned algorithm of Faour et al.\ with a method presented by Kawarabayashi et al.\ [DISC 2020].
Paper Structure (12 sections, 27 theorems, 4 equations, 1 table, 5 algorithms)

This paper contains 12 sections, 27 theorems, 4 equations, 1 table, 5 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 1.1

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with node-weight function $w:V\rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, let $c$ be a $\beta$-bounded coloring of $G$ and let $1\leq f\leq \beta$ be an integer parameter. Upon termination, $\mathtt{Sparse\_Set}(c,f)$ returns a subset $X\subseteq V$ that satisfies: (1) $|X\cap L(v)|<

Theorems & Definitions (48)

  • Lemma 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Lemma 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 38 more