Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An example of an "unlinked" set of $2k + 3$ points in $2k$-space

M. Starkov

Abstract

Take any $d + 3$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. It is known that (a) if $d = 2k + 1$, then there are two linked $(k + 1)$-simplices with the vertices at these points; (b) if $d = 2k$, then there are two disjoint $(k + 1)$-tuples of these points such that their convex hulls intersect. The analogue of (b) for $d = 2k + 1$, which is also the analogue of (a) for intersections (instead of linkings), states that there are two disjoint $(k + 1)$- and $(k + 2)$-tuples of these points such that their convex hulls intersect. This analogue is correct by (a).

An example of an "unlinked" set of $2k + 3$ points in $2k$-space

Abstract

Take any points in . It is known that (a) if , then there are two linked -simplices with the vertices at these points; (b) if , then there are two disjoint -tuples of these points such that their convex hulls intersect. The analogue of (b) for , which is also the analogue of (a) for intersections (instead of linkings), states that there are two disjoint - and -tuples of these points such that their convex hulls intersect. This analogue is correct by (a).
Paper Structure (5 theorems, 2 equations)

This paper contains 5 theorems, 2 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Take any $d + 3$ points in general position in $\mathbb{R}^d$. (a) If $d = 2k + 1$, then there are two linked $(k + 1)$-simplices with the vertices at these points. (b) If $d = 2k$, then there are two disjoint $(k + 1)$-tuples of these points such that their convex hulls intersect.

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 3
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Remark
  • proof : Proof of Remark \ref{['a:extra']} modulo Lemma \ref{['corr']}
  • Lemma 5
  • proof : Proof
  • Lemma 6
  • Lemma 7
  • ...and 4 more