Ground state energy of the low density Bose gas with two-body and three-body interactions
François L. A. Visconti
TL;DR
This work proves that the leading ground-state energy per volume of a dilute Bose gas with both two-body and three-body interactions is governed by the two-body scattering length $a(V)$ and the three-body scattering energy $b_{ ilde{ ext{M}}}(W)$, yielding $e( ho,V,W)=igl(4 ext{π} a(V) ho^2+ frac{1}{6} b_{ ilde{ ext{M}}}(W) ho^3igr)(1+O(Y^ u))$ in the dilute limit with $Y= ho ilde{ ext{a}}^3$ and $ ilde{ ext{a}}= ext{max}(a(V), ho b_{ ilde{ ext{M}}}(W))$. The proof combines a robust lower-bound strategy based on a multi-scale Dyson lemma and Temple’s inequality with a matching upper-bound construction using a Jastrow-type trial state incorporating both two- and three-body correlations; the analysis carefully decouples the two-body and three-body contributions despite their coexistence. This work extends classical two-body results (Dyson, Lieb–Yngvason) and the recent three-body theory (Nam–Ricaud–Triay), resolving a conjecture for the mixed interaction case. The results clarify the role of distinct length scales (two-body and three-body Gross–Pitaevskii scales) and provide a rigorous foundation for the leading-order energy in experiments where both interaction types are relevant. Implications include improved understanding of dilute Bose condensates stabilized by three-body effects and guidance for mean-field-type limits (e.g., GP and beyond) with composite interactions.
Abstract
In the present paper we study the low density Bose gas in the thermodynamic limit interacting via two-body and three-body interaction potentials. We prove that the leading order of the ground state energy is entirely characterised by both the scattering length of the two-body potential and the scattering energy of the three-body potential. The corresponding result for two-body interactions was proven in seminal papers of Dyson (1957) and of Lieb-Yngvason (1998), and the result for three-body interactions was proven by Nam-Ricaud-Triay (2022). The present result resolves a conjecture of Nam-Ricaud-Triay (2022).
