Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Boundary control of generalized Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers-Huxley equation: Well-Posedness, Stabilization and Numerical Studies

Manil T. Mohan, Shri Lal Raghudev Ram Singh

Abstract

A boundary control problem for the following generalized Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers-Huxley equation: $$u_t=νu_{xx}-μu_{xxx}-αu^δu_x+βu(1-u^δ)(u^δ-γ), \ x\in[0,1], \ t>0,$$ where $ν,μ,α,β>0,$ $δ\in[1,\infty)$, $γ\in(0,1)$ subject to Neumann boundary conditions is considered in this work. We first establish the well-posedness of the Neumann boundary value problem by an application of monotonicity arguments, the Hartman-Stampacchia theorem, the Minty-Browder theorem, and the Crandall-Liggett theorem. The additional difficulties caused by the third order linear term is successfully handled by proving a proper version of the Minty-Browder theorem. By using suitable feedback boundary controls, we demonstrate $\mathrm{L}^2$- and $\mathrm{H}^1$-stability properties of the closed-loop system for sufficiently large $ν>0$. The analytical conclusions from this work are supported and validated by numerical investigations.

Boundary control of generalized Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers-Huxley equation: Well-Posedness, Stabilization and Numerical Studies

Abstract

A boundary control problem for the following generalized Korteweg-de Vries-Burgers-Huxley equation: where , subject to Neumann boundary conditions is considered in this work. We first establish the well-posedness of the Neumann boundary value problem by an application of monotonicity arguments, the Hartman-Stampacchia theorem, the Minty-Browder theorem, and the Crandall-Liggett theorem. The additional difficulties caused by the third order linear term is successfully handled by proving a proper version of the Minty-Browder theorem. By using suitable feedback boundary controls, we demonstrate - and -stability properties of the closed-loop system for sufficiently large . The analytical conclusions from this work are supported and validated by numerical investigations.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 10 theorems, 120 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 11 sections, 10 theorems, 120 equations, 11 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Let $\mathrm{X}$ and $\mathrm{Y}$ be reflexive Banach spaces such that the continuous embedding $\mathrm{X}\hookrightarrow\mathrm{Y}$ is dense. Let $T:\mathrm{X}\to\mathrm{Y}^*$ be monotone, that is, hemicontinuous, that is, and coercive, that is, operator. Then $T$ is onto, that is, $\mathrm{Range}(T)=\mathrm{Y}^*$.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Time evolution of uncontrolled GKdVBH equation for $\nu = 1, \alpha=1,\beta=1,\delta=1,\gamma=0.5$ and $u_{0}(x) = \sin(\pi x)$.
  • Figure 2: Time evolution of uncontrolled GKdVBH equation for $\nu = 1, \alpha=1,\beta=1,\delta=2,\gamma=0.5$ and $u_{0}(x) = \sin(\pi x)$.
  • Figure 3: Time evolution of uncontrolled GKdVBH equation for $\nu = 1, \alpha=1,\beta=1,\delta=3,\gamma=0.5$ and $u_{0}(x) = \sin(\pi x)$.
  • Figure 4: Time evolution of controlled GKdVBH equation for $\nu = 1, \alpha=1,\beta=1,\delta=1,\gamma=0.5,\eta = 1, \mu = 0.1$ and $u_{0}(x) = \sin(\pi x)$.
  • Figure 5: Time evolution of uncontrolled GKdVBH equation for $\nu = 1, \alpha=1,\beta=1,\delta=2,\gamma=0.5,\eta = 1, \mu = 0.1$ and $u_{0}(x) = \sin(\pi x)$.
  • ...and 6 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Remark 1.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.5
  • proof
  • ...and 13 more