Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Strong disorder and very strong disorder are equivalent for directed polymers

Stefan Junk, Hubert Lacoin

TL;DR

This work resolves a long-standing conjecture on the phase structure of directed polymers in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ by proving that, for $d\ge 3$ and under an environment bounded above, the weak-strong disorder threshold and the very-strong disorder threshold coincide, i.e., $\beta_c=\bar{\beta}_c$, and that weak disorder persists at criticality. The authors reduce the problem to endpoint localization via a spine/size-biasing framework and establish exponential decay of the normalized partition function in the very-strong regime through a sophisticated combination of fractional moments, tail estimates, and stochastic-calculus techniques in both discrete and continuum settings. A key corollary describes the tail behavior of the critical partition function and shows that weak disorder at $\beta_c$ yields precise moment-dimension control, with implications for the regularity of the free energy near criticality. The results provide a sharp, dichotomous phase picture without intermediate phases, and they open avenues for refined analyses of critical behavior and near-critical decay rates in higher dimensions. Overall, the paper advances the mathematical understanding of disorder-induced localization and sharp phase transitions in polymer models.

Abstract

We show that if the normalized partition function $W^β_n$ of the directed polymer model on $\mathbb Z^d$ converges to zero, then it does so exponentially fast. This implies that there exists a critical value $β_c$ for the inverse temperature such that the normalized partition function has a non-degenerate limit for all $β\in [0,β_c]$ -- weak disorder holds -- while for $β\in (β_c,\infty)$ it converges exponentially fast to zero -- very strong disorder holds. This solves a twenty-years-old conjecture formulated by Comets, Yoshida, Carmona and Hu. Our proof requires a technical assumption on the environment, namely, that it is bounded from above.

Strong disorder and very strong disorder are equivalent for directed polymers

TL;DR

This work resolves a long-standing conjecture on the phase structure of directed polymers in by proving that, for and under an environment bounded above, the weak-strong disorder threshold and the very-strong disorder threshold coincide, i.e., , and that weak disorder persists at criticality. The authors reduce the problem to endpoint localization via a spine/size-biasing framework and establish exponential decay of the normalized partition function in the very-strong regime through a sophisticated combination of fractional moments, tail estimates, and stochastic-calculus techniques in both discrete and continuum settings. A key corollary describes the tail behavior of the critical partition function and shows that weak disorder at yields precise moment-dimension control, with implications for the regularity of the free energy near criticality. The results provide a sharp, dichotomous phase picture without intermediate phases, and they open avenues for refined analyses of critical behavior and near-critical decay rates in higher dimensions. Overall, the paper advances the mathematical understanding of disorder-induced localization and sharp phase transitions in polymer models.

Abstract

We show that if the normalized partition function of the directed polymer model on converges to zero, then it does so exponentially fast. This implies that there exists a critical value for the inverse temperature such that the normalized partition function has a non-degenerate limit for all -- weak disorder holds -- while for it converges exponentially fast to zero -- very strong disorder holds. This solves a twenty-years-old conjecture formulated by Comets, Yoshida, Carmona and Hu. Our proof requires a technical assumption on the environment, namely, that it is bounded from above.
Paper Structure (34 sections, 28 theorems, 186 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 34 sections, 28 theorems, 186 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem A

The following hold:

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The environment $\omega^{(j)}$ is simply the environment restricted to the $j$-th slice of width $s$, which has been shifted so that $(js,X_{js})$ (the solid circles on the pictures) plays the role of the origin. Since the slices are disjoint and $X$ is independent of $\omega$, the environments $(\omega^{(j)})_{j\ge 1}$ are independent and distributed like $\omega^{(0)}$. The environments $\widetilde{\omega}^{(j)}$ are obtained by replacing the environment by $\widehat{\omega}$ along the spine. The Markov property applied to $X$ ensures that $(X^{(j)})_{j\ge 0}$ (which described the spine portions after shift) are i.i.d. and the same thing can be said about the restriction of $\widehat{\omega}$ to each time interval $\llbracket js+1,(j+1)s\rrbracket$.

Theorems & Definitions (53)

  • Theorem A: CY06
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem B
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • ...and 43 more