Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Low Acceptance Agreement Tests via Bounded-Degree Symplectic HDXs

Yotam Dikstein, Irit Dinur, Alexander Lubotzky

TL;DR

The paper constructs bounded-degree, linear-size high dimensional expanders arising as quotients of the affine symplectic building \tilde{C}_g(\mathbb{Q}_p) and proves these complexes have no small connected covers. Leveraging swap cocycle expansion and a local-to-global coboundary framework, the authors derive a 1% agreement test for derandomized direct product testing, improving previous bounds that required SL-type (type A) structures. A key innovation is replacing SL-based quotients with symplectic-type quotients, made possible by the congruence subgroup property for Sp(2g,\mathbb{Q}_p), and by extending swap expansion techniques to the symplectic setting. The practical impact lies in providing a polynomial-time, explicit construction of bounded-degree HDXs that enable strong low-acceptance agreement testing, with potential implications for PCPs and derandomized testing within complexity theory.

Abstract

We solve the derandomized direct product testing question in the low acceptance regime, by constructing new high dimensional expanders that have no small connected covers. We show that our complexes have swap cocycle expansion, which allows us to deduce the agreement theorem by relying on previous work. Derandomized direct product testing, also known as agreement testing, is the following problem. Let X be a family of k-element subsets of [n] and let $\{f_s:s\toΣ\}_{s\in X}$ be an ensemble of local functions, each defined over a subset $s\subset [n]$. Suppose that we run the following so-called agreement test: choose a random pair of sets $s_1,s_2\in X$ that intersect on $\sqrt k$ elements, and accept if $f_{s_1},f_{s_2}$ agree on the elements in $s_1\cap s_2$. We denote the success probability of this test by $Agr(\{f_s\})$. Given that $Agr(\{f_s\})=ε>0$, is there a global function $G:[n]\toΣ$ such that $f_s = G|_s$ for a non-negligible fraction of $s\in X$ ? We construct a family X of k-subsets of $[n]$ such that $|X| = O(n)$ and such that it satisfies the low acceptance agreement theorem. Namely, $Agr (\{f_s\}) > ε\; \; \longrightarrow$ there is a function $G:[n]\toΣ$ such that $\Pr_s[f_s\overset{0.99}{\approx} G|_s]\geq poly(ε)$. A key idea is to replace the well-studied LSV complexes by symplectic high dimensional expanders (HDXs). The family X is just the k-faces of the new symplectic HDXs. The later serve our needs better since their fundamental group satisfies the congruence subgroup property, which implies that they lack small covers. We also give a polynomial-time algorithm to construct this family of symplectic HDXs.

Low Acceptance Agreement Tests via Bounded-Degree Symplectic HDXs

TL;DR

The paper constructs bounded-degree, linear-size high dimensional expanders arising as quotients of the affine symplectic building \tilde{C}_g(\mathbb{Q}_p) and proves these complexes have no small connected covers. Leveraging swap cocycle expansion and a local-to-global coboundary framework, the authors derive a 1% agreement test for derandomized direct product testing, improving previous bounds that required SL-type (type A) structures. A key innovation is replacing SL-based quotients with symplectic-type quotients, made possible by the congruence subgroup property for Sp(2g,\mathbb{Q}_p), and by extending swap expansion techniques to the symplectic setting. The practical impact lies in providing a polynomial-time, explicit construction of bounded-degree HDXs that enable strong low-acceptance agreement testing, with potential implications for PCPs and derandomized testing within complexity theory.

Abstract

We solve the derandomized direct product testing question in the low acceptance regime, by constructing new high dimensional expanders that have no small connected covers. We show that our complexes have swap cocycle expansion, which allows us to deduce the agreement theorem by relying on previous work. Derandomized direct product testing, also known as agreement testing, is the following problem. Let X be a family of k-element subsets of [n] and let be an ensemble of local functions, each defined over a subset . Suppose that we run the following so-called agreement test: choose a random pair of sets that intersect on elements, and accept if agree on the elements in . We denote the success probability of this test by . Given that , is there a global function such that for a non-negligible fraction of ? We construct a family X of k-subsets of such that and such that it satisfies the low acceptance agreement theorem. Namely, there is a function such that . A key idea is to replace the well-studied LSV complexes by symplectic high dimensional expanders (HDXs). The family X is just the k-faces of the new symplectic HDXs. The later serve our needs better since their fundamental group satisfies the congruence subgroup property, which implies that they lack small covers. We also give a polynomial-time algorithm to construct this family of symplectic HDXs.
Paper Structure (46 sections, 41 theorems, 95 equations, 3 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 46 sections, 41 theorems, 95 equations, 3 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

For every $\varepsilon>0$, there exist $c>0$ and large enough integers $k<g$ and a prime $p$ such that the following holds. There exists an infinite family of constant degree connected $g+1$-partite simplicial complexes $\{X_N\}_N$ that are finite quotients of $\tilde{C}_g$ such that $X_N$ has $N$ v where $f\approx f'$ indicates that the two functions agree on $0.99$ of their domain.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The contraction
  • Figure 2: Contraction of the interesting case
  • Figure 3: The case where $w_1 \in C_g[i_0]$ is on the left. The case where $w_1 \in C_g[i_1]$ is on the right.

Theorems & Definitions (139)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4: Informal version of thm:agrcover-technical
  • Definition 2.1: Join of complexes
  • Definition 2.2: local spectral expander
  • Theorem 2.3: Oppenheim2018
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5: DiksteinD2019AlevFT2019
  • Theorem 2.6: DiksteinD2019
  • ...and 129 more