Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Responsible developments and networking research: a reflection beyond a paper ethical statement

Daphne Tuncer, Marc Bruyere

TL;DR

The paper argues that networking research must integrate ethical and environmental considerations within the context of rapid digital transformation. It leverages two frameworks—the French pilot digital-ethics committee (CNPEN) and the four-level ethical engagement model—to structure and motivate reflection. By reframing networking along five non-technical axes (Time, Space, Interaction, Automation, Environment) and proposing concrete actions (informal workshops, richer ethical guidance, cross-disciplinary methods), it aims to embed ethics and sustainability into research practice. The work seeks to catalyze a community-wide, action-oriented debate and provide a blueprint for responsible networking research going forward.

Abstract

Several recent initiatives have proposed new directions for research practices and their operations in the computer science community, from updated codes of conduct that clarify the use of AI-assisted tools to the inclusion of ethical statements and the organization of working groups on the environmental footprint of digitalization. In this position paper, we focus on the specific case of networking research. We reflect on the technical realization of the community and its incidence beyond techno-centric contributions. In particular, we structure the discussion around two frameworks that were recently developed in different contexts to describe the sense of engagement and responsibilities to which the practitioner of a computing-related area may be confronted.

Responsible developments and networking research: a reflection beyond a paper ethical statement

TL;DR

The paper argues that networking research must integrate ethical and environmental considerations within the context of rapid digital transformation. It leverages two frameworks—the French pilot digital-ethics committee (CNPEN) and the four-level ethical engagement model—to structure and motivate reflection. By reframing networking along five non-technical axes (Time, Space, Interaction, Automation, Environment) and proposing concrete actions (informal workshops, richer ethical guidance, cross-disciplinary methods), it aims to embed ethics and sustainability into research practice. The work seeks to catalyze a community-wide, action-oriented debate and provide a blueprint for responsible networking research going forward.

Abstract

Several recent initiatives have proposed new directions for research practices and their operations in the computer science community, from updated codes of conduct that clarify the use of AI-assisted tools to the inclusion of ethical statements and the organization of working groups on the environmental footprint of digitalization. In this position paper, we focus on the specific case of networking research. We reflect on the technical realization of the community and its incidence beyond techno-centric contributions. In particular, we structure the discussion around two frameworks that were recently developed in different contexts to describe the sense of engagement and responsibilities to which the practitioner of a computing-related area may be confronted.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 1 figure, 2 tables)