Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Limiting Behavior in Missing Sums of Sumsets

Aditya Jambhale, Rauan Kaldybayev, Steven J. Miller, Chris Yao

Abstract

We study $|A + A|$ as a random variable, where $A \subseteq \{0, \dots, N\}$ is a random subset such that each $0 \le n \le N$ is included with probability $0 < p < 1$, and where $A + A$ is the set of sums $a + b$ for $a,b$ in $A$. Lazarev, Miller, and O'Bryant studied the distribution of $2N + 1 - |A + A|$, the number of summands not represented in $A + A$ when $p = 1/2$. A recent paper by Chu, King, Luntzlara, Martinez, Miller, Shao, Sun, and Xu generalizes this to all $p\in (0,1)$, calculating the first and second moments of the number of missing summands and establishing exponential upper and lower bounds on the probability of missing exactly $n$ summands, mostly working in the limit of large $N$. We provide exponential bounds on the probability of missing at least $n$ summands, find another expression for the second moment of the number of missing summands, extract its leading-order behavior in the limit of small $p$, and show that the variance grows asymptotically slower than the mean, proving that for small $p$, the number of missing summands is very likely to be near its expected value.

Limiting Behavior in Missing Sums of Sumsets

Abstract

We study as a random variable, where is a random subset such that each is included with probability , and where is the set of sums for in . Lazarev, Miller, and O'Bryant studied the distribution of , the number of summands not represented in when . A recent paper by Chu, King, Luntzlara, Martinez, Miller, Shao, Sun, and Xu generalizes this to all , calculating the first and second moments of the number of missing summands and establishing exponential upper and lower bounds on the probability of missing exactly summands, mostly working in the limit of large . We provide exponential bounds on the probability of missing at least summands, find another expression for the second moment of the number of missing summands, extract its leading-order behavior in the limit of small , and show that the variance grows asymptotically slower than the mean, proving that for small , the number of missing summands is very likely to be near its expected value.
Paper Structure (17 sections, 34 theorems, 99 equations, 6 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 17 sections, 34 theorems, 99 equations, 6 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.0

For any $0 \le m \le 2N$, We say that as $N \to \infty$, $W$ is the convolution of $Y$ with $Z$.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Probabilities of non-inclusion of $n$ into $A + A$ for $0 \le n \le 2N$ and $p = 1/2$, $N = 40$.
  • Figure 2: Probabilities of missing more than $n$ summands on the left fringe for $p = 1/2$ and $N = 200$. Monte Carlo simulation (MC) with $1 \times 10^6$ trial runs, theoretical upper bound (UB) from Corollary \ref{['corr:better bound on prob of missing many']}, and theoretical lower bound (LB) from \ref{['eq:missing more than n lower bound']} are shown. Here, $\beta$ is the slope of $\log(\mathbb{P}\left(Y \ge n\right))$ as $n$ increases, equal to $\log{\sqrt{1 - p}}$ for LB and $\log{\lambda_1}$ for UB (see eq. \ref{['eq:defn lambda12']}). For MC, $\beta$ is estimated numerically by fitting a least-squares line, which entails not only random error but also systematic error because the original curve seems to be concave.
  • Figure 3: Second moment $\mathbb{E}\left[Y^2\right]$ of the number of missing summands on the left fringe: theoretical prediction \ref{['eq:second moment']}, Monte Carlo values, and the $4 p^{-4}$ approximation \ref{['eq:2p-4 approx']} (left); discrepancies between Monte Carlo values $\mathbb{E}\left[Y^2\right]_{\rm mc}$ and the infinite sum $\mathbb{E}\left[Y^2\right]_{\rm is}$ from \ref{['eq:second moment']}, together with what we expect the discrepancies to be based on simulation size and $N$ (right).
  • Figure 4: The cumulative distribution function of $Y$, normalized by $\mathbb{E}\left[Y\right]$, for $N = 800$ and $p = 0.05, 0.08, 0.16, 0.24, 0.32$. (Monte Carlo simulation.)
  • Figure 5: Snail diagram for $m = 17$, $n = 13$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Theorem 1.0
  • Corollary 1.0
  • Corollary 1.0
  • Proposition 1.0
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • ...and 49 more