Prospects for inconsistency detection using large language models and sheaves
Steve Huntsman, Michael Robinson, Ludmilla Huntsman
TL;DR
The paper addresses global inconsistency and mis/disinformation by proposing a framework that uses LLMs to assign local numeric consistency scores to claims (on a scale of $0$ to $10$) and then lifts these local judgments to global consistency with sheaf cohomology. It develops a presheaf/sheaf-based approach to glue local data across a topology of jurisdictions, and connects CNF-SAT / MAX-SAT with cellular sheaves to illustrate the computational structure of consistency. The contributions include empirical demonstration of local consistency ratings by LLMs, a formal sheaf-theoretic blueprint for global coherence, and deployment considerations for governance-scale applications. The work highlights practical challenges (temporal ordering, scalability, noise in LLM outputs) and argues for a coherence-theory pathway to trustworthy, socially grounded assessment of consistency in policy, law, and public discourse, potentially aided by retrieval-augmented generation and PPP-driven deployment.
Abstract
We demonstrate that large language models can produce reasonable numerical ratings of the logical consistency of claims. We also outline a mathematical approach based on sheaf theory for lifting such ratings to hypertexts such as laws, jurisprudence, and social media and evaluating their consistency globally. This approach is a promising avenue to increasing consistency in and of government, as well as to combating mis- and disinformation and related ills.
