Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantization of Kähler Manifolds via Brane Quantization

YuTung Yau

TL;DR

This work develops a rigorous local model for brane quantization, linking A-model coisotropic-brane morphisms to holomorphic deformation quantization and geometric quantization. It proves that any deformation quantization of a symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ admits a holomorphic extension to a complexification $(X,\Omega)$, and that on Stein $X$ such holomorphic quantizations are globally trivializable, enabling a precise diagrammatic relation between $\mathcal{C}^\infty(M)$- and holomorphic quantizations. The authors construct sheaves $\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$ and modules $\mathcal{L}^{(k)}$, $\mathcal{L}^{(-k)}$, and bimodules $\mathcal{L}_{\operatorname{sm}}^{(2k)}$ to realize the morphism spaces $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}^{(k)},\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}^{(k)})$, $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B},\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$, and related spaces, including their extensions to the conjugate geometry. The results illuminate a formal bridge to geometric Langlands-type structures and provide a local, analytically controlled framework for brane quantization with metaplectic corrections. This framework yields a coherent, algebraic realization of brane morphisms as (bi)modules over deformation quantizations, with explicit realizations as twisted differential operators and holomorphic quantizations.

Abstract

In their physical proposal for quantization [20], Gukov-Witten suggested that, given a symplectic manifold $M$ with a complexification $X$, the A-model morphism spaces $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$ and $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$ should recover holomorphic deformation quantization of $X$ and geometric quantization of $M$ respectively, where $\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}$ is a canonical coisotropic A-brane on $X$ and $\mathcal{B}$ is a Lagrangian A-brane supported on $M$. Assuming $M$ is spin and Kähler with a prequantum line bundle $L$, Chan-Leung-Li [10] constructed a subsheaf $\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$ of smooth functions on $M$ with a non-formal star product and a left $\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$-module structure on the sheaf of holomorphic sections of $L^{\otimes k} \otimes \sqrt{K}$. In this paper, we give a careful treatment of the relation between (holomorphic) deformation quantizations of $M$ and $X$. As a result, Chan-Leung-Li's work [10] provides a mathematical realization of the action of $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$ on $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$. By Fedosov's gluing arguments, we also construct a $\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$-$\overline{\mathcal{O}}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$-bimodule structure on the sheaf of smooth sections of $L^{\otimes 2k}$ to realize the actions of $\operatorname{Hom}(\mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$ and $\operatorname{Hom}(\overline{\mathcal{B}}_{\operatorname{cc}}, \overline{\mathcal{B}}_{\operatorname{cc}})$ on $\operatorname{Hom}(\overline{\mathcal{B}}_{\operatorname{cc}}, \mathcal{B}_{\operatorname{cc}})$, which is related to the analytic geometric Langlands program.

Quantization of Kähler Manifolds via Brane Quantization

TL;DR

This work develops a rigorous local model for brane quantization, linking A-model coisotropic-brane morphisms to holomorphic deformation quantization and geometric quantization. It proves that any deformation quantization of a symplectic manifold admits a holomorphic extension to a complexification , and that on Stein such holomorphic quantizations are globally trivializable, enabling a precise diagrammatic relation between - and holomorphic quantizations. The authors construct sheaves and modules , , and bimodules to realize the morphism spaces , , and related spaces, including their extensions to the conjugate geometry. The results illuminate a formal bridge to geometric Langlands-type structures and provide a local, analytically controlled framework for brane quantization with metaplectic corrections. This framework yields a coherent, algebraic realization of brane morphisms as (bi)modules over deformation quantizations, with explicit realizations as twisted differential operators and holomorphic quantizations.

Abstract

In their physical proposal for quantization [20], Gukov-Witten suggested that, given a symplectic manifold with a complexification , the A-model morphism spaces and should recover holomorphic deformation quantization of and geometric quantization of respectively, where is a canonical coisotropic A-brane on and is a Lagrangian A-brane supported on . Assuming is spin and Kähler with a prequantum line bundle , Chan-Leung-Li [10] constructed a subsheaf of smooth functions on with a non-formal star product and a left -module structure on the sheaf of holomorphic sections of . In this paper, we give a careful treatment of the relation between (holomorphic) deformation quantizations of and . As a result, Chan-Leung-Li's work [10] provides a mathematical realization of the action of on . By Fedosov's gluing arguments, we also construct a --bimodule structure on the sheaf of smooth sections of to realize the actions of and on , which is related to the analytic geometric Langlands program.
Paper Structure (25 sections, 36 theorems, 103 equations)

This paper contains 25 sections, 36 theorems, 103 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The sheaf $\mathcal{L}_{\operatorname{sm}}^{(2k)}$ of smooth sections of $L^{\otimes 2k}$ has an $\mathcal{O}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$-$\overline{\mathcal{O}}_{\operatorname{qu}}^{(k)}$ bimodule structure such that the natural pairing $\mathcal{L}^{(k)} \otimes \overline{\mathcal{L}}^{(-k)} \to \m

Theorems & Definitions (78)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Example 3.3
  • Theorem 3.4
  • Theorem 3.5: Theorem 2.1 in Neu2002; a slight generalization of Theorem 3.2 in Fed1994
  • ...and 68 more