Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cellular structure of the Pommaret-Seiler resolution for quasi-stable ideals

Rodrigo Iglesias, Eduardo Sáenz-de-Cabezón

Abstract

We prove that the Pommaret-Seiler resolution for quasi-stable ideals is cellular and give a cellular structure for it. This shows that this resolution is a generalization of the well known Eliahou-Kervaire resolution for stable ideals in a deeper sense. We also prove that the Pommaret-Seiler resolution can be reduced to the minimal one via Discrete Morse Theory and provide a constructive algorithm to perform this reduction.

Cellular structure of the Pommaret-Seiler resolution for quasi-stable ideals

Abstract

We prove that the Pommaret-Seiler resolution for quasi-stable ideals is cellular and give a cellular structure for it. This shows that this resolution is a generalization of the well known Eliahou-Kervaire resolution for stable ideals in a deeper sense. We also prove that the Pommaret-Seiler resolution can be reduced to the minimal one via Discrete Morse Theory and provide a constructive algorithm to perform this reduction.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 7 theorems, 24 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 7 theorems, 24 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

A monomial ideal $I$ is stable if and only if its minimal monomial generating set is also a Pommaret basis for $I$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Minimal generating set (left) and Pommaret basis (right) for $I=\langle x_1^2, x_2^3\rangle$. In the left diagram the usual cones of each of the generators overlap on all their common multiples, while in the right diagram, the involutive cones do not overlap, yielding a disjoint decomposition of the set of monomials in $I$.
  • Figure 2: $P$-graph of the ideal $I=\langle x^2,y^4,y^2z^2,z^3\rangle$.
  • Figure 3: $P$-graph of the ideal $I=\langle x^2,y^4,y^2z^2,z^3\rangle$ with critical faces of Morse reduction.
  • Figure 4: Reduced cell complex for the ideal $I=\langle x^2,y^4,y^2z^2,z^3\rangle$ .

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.1
  • Example 2.1
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.1: cf. S10, Proposition 5.5.6
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Definition 2.4
  • Remark 2.3
  • ...and 15 more