HetDAPAC: Distributed Attribute-Based Private Access Control with Heterogeneous Attributes
Shreya Meel, Sennur Ulukus
TL;DR
HetDAPAC introduces a hybrid, distributed-private access control framework that uses $D$ dedicated authorities plus a central verifier to handle $N$ attributes. By off-loading non-sensitive attributes to a central server that relays information to the dedicated servers, the paper achieves a higher download rate of $R=rac{1}{K+1}$ (versus $R=rac{1}{2K}$ in prior work) while incurring controlled privacy leakage for non-sensitive attributes. The proposed scheme uses per-message sub-packetization, private permutations, and asymmetric downloads to servers, with exact recovery of the designated message $W_{m{v}^*}$ and privacy guarantees, and demonstrates a specialized $(N,3,K)$ construction achieving $R=rac{2}{3K}$ at a load $rac{2}{3}$. The results offer a flexible balance between communication efficiency and attribute privacy, and they extend to time-sharing combinations with existing DAPAC schemes for intermediate operating points.
Abstract
Verifying user attributes to provide fine-grained access control to databases is fundamental to an attribute-based authentication system. In such systems, either a single (central) authority verifies all attributes, or multiple independent authorities verify individual attributes distributedly to allow a user to access records stored on the servers. While a \emph{central} setup is more communication cost efficient, it causes privacy breach of \emph{all} user attributes to a central authority. Recently, Jafarpisheh et al. studied an information theoretic formulation of the \emph{distributed} multi-authority setup with $N$ non-colluding authorities, $N$ attributes and $K$ possible values for each attribute, called an $(N,K)$ distributed attribute-based private access control (DAPAC) system, where each server learns only one attribute value that it verifies, and remains oblivious to the remaining $N-1$ attributes. We show that off-loading a subset of attributes to a central server for verification improves the achievable rate from $\frac{1}{2K}$ in Jafarpisheh et al. to $\frac{1}{K+1}$ in this paper, thus \emph{almost doubling the rate} for relatively large $K$, while sacrificing the privacy of a few possibly non-sensitive attributes.
