Null Space Properties of Neural Networks with Applications to Image Steganography
Xiang Li, Kevin M. Short
TL;DR
This work extends the classical linear null space concept to nonlinear maps by defining the nonlinear null space $N(f)$ for neural networks and examining its implications for FCNNs and CNNs. It identifies practical constructs such as partial null spaces $PN_{f_1}(f)$ and shows how the first linear layer often captures the overall null space, with ReLU networks providing intuitive geometric illustrations. Leveraging $N(f)$, the authors propose a steganography method that hides a secret image inside a cover image by projecting onto $N(f)$ and combining with the orthogonal component, ensuring $f(S)=f(H)$ while $S$ visually resembles $C$. Through experiments on MNIST, FMNIST, EMNIST, and CIFAR-10, the paper demonstrates that null-space steganography can reliably induce the hidden content’s classification while preserving cover-looking visuals, and it discusses broader reliability concerns about how NNs “see” data compared to humans.
Abstract
This paper explores the null space properties of neural networks. We extend the null space definition from linear to nonlinear maps and discuss the presence of a null space in neural networks. The null space of a given neural network can tell us the part of the input data that makes no contribution to the final prediction so that we can use it to trick the neural network. This reveals an inherent weakness in neural networks that can be exploited. One application described here leads to a method of image steganography. Through experiments on image datasets such as MNIST, we show that we can use null space components to force the neural network to choose a selected hidden image class, even though the overall image can be made to look like a completely different image. We conclude by showing comparisons between what a human viewer would see, and the part of the image that the neural network is actually using to make predictions and, hence, show that what the neural network ``sees'' is completely different than what we would expect.
