Towards Efficient Diffusion-Based Image Editing with Instant Attention Masks
Siyu Zou, Jiji Tang, Yiyi Zhou, Jing He, Chaoyi Zhao, Rongsheng Zhang, Zhipeng Hu, Xiaoshuai Sun
TL;DR
This paper tackles efficient semantic image editing with diffusion models by generating instant target masks from cross-attention during denoising. It introduces InstDiffEdit, a training-free method that refines attention-based masks and guides diffusion updates, with an inpainting fallback to improve global consistency. A new Editing-Mask benchmark is proposed to assess mask accuracy and local editing ability, and experiments on ImageNet and Imagen show 5–6x faster inference and better editing quality compared to DiffEdit. The approach is plug-and-play for latent-diffusion models and enhances the practicality of diffusion-based image editing by combining fast mask generation, robust refinement, and local-global editing strategies.
Abstract
Diffusion-based Image Editing (DIE) is an emerging research hot-spot, which often applies a semantic mask to control the target area for diffusion-based editing. However, most existing solutions obtain these masks via manual operations or off-line processing, greatly reducing their efficiency. In this paper, we propose a novel and efficient image editing method for Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models, termed Instant Diffusion Editing(InstDiffEdit). In particular, InstDiffEdit aims to employ the cross-modal attention ability of existing diffusion models to achieve instant mask guidance during the diffusion steps. To reduce the noise of attention maps and realize the full automatics, we equip InstDiffEdit with a training-free refinement scheme to adaptively aggregate the attention distributions for the automatic yet accurate mask generation. Meanwhile, to supplement the existing evaluations of DIE, we propose a new benchmark called Editing-Mask to examine the mask accuracy and local editing ability of existing methods. To validate InstDiffEdit, we also conduct extensive experiments on ImageNet and Imagen, and compare it with a bunch of the SOTA methods. The experimental results show that InstDiffEdit not only outperforms the SOTA methods in both image quality and editing results, but also has a much faster inference speed, i.e., +5 to +6 times.
