Confounded Budgeted Causal Bandits
Fateme Jamshidi, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash
TL;DR
This work addresses budgeted causal multi-armed bandits with non-uniform intervention costs and hidden confounders in the underlying causal graph. It proposes two main algorithms—g-cumulative for cumulative regret and g-simple for simple regret—grounded in identifiability-based reward estimation from observational data and a cost-aware exploration strategy. The authors establish upper and lower bounds for both regret notions, and provide extensive experiments showing improvements over state-of-the-art baselines across general graphs and no-backdoor settings. The findings offer practical impact for budget-constrained experimentation where interventions carry varying costs and unobserved confounders are present, with applications in medicine, policy, and social science.
Abstract
We study the problem of learning 'good' interventions in a stochastic environment modeled by its underlying causal graph. Good interventions refer to interventions that maximize rewards. Specifically, we consider the setting of a pre-specified budget constraint, where interventions can have non-uniform costs. We show that this problem can be formulated as maximizing the expected reward for a stochastic multi-armed bandit with side information. We propose an algorithm to minimize the cumulative regret in general causal graphs. This algorithm trades off observations and interventions based on their costs to achieve the optimal reward. This algorithm generalizes the state-of-the-art methods by allowing non-uniform costs and hidden confounders in the causal graph. Furthermore, we develop an algorithm to minimize the simple regret in the budgeted setting with non-uniform costs and also general causal graphs. We provide theoretical guarantees, including both upper and lower bounds, as well as empirical evaluations of our algorithms. Our empirical results showcase that our algorithms outperform the state of the art.
