Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Criterion of the global solvability of regular and singular differential-algebraic equations

Maria Filipkovska

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive criterion for the global solvability of semilinear DAEs, addressing both regular and singular pencils via a block-operator pencil and direct-space decompositions. By reducing singular and regular DAEs to coupled ODE/AE systems and imposing consistency conditions on initial data, the authors establish conditions for global existence, Lagrange stability, and boundedness, and they formulate blow-up criteria through Lyapunov-type functions and differential inequalities. The results are unified in a global solvability framework that covers both regular and singular cases and is supported by concrete examples that illustrate global solvability versus finite-time blow-up. The practical impact lies in providing rigorous, checkable criteria for the long-term behavior of DAEs in engineering and physics models, enabling reliable prediction and control of complex dynamical systems.

Abstract

For regular and nonregular (singular) semilinear differential-algebraic equations (DAEs), we prove theorems on the existence and uniqueness of global solutions and on the blow-up of solutions, which allow one to identify the sets of initial values for which the initial value problem has global solutions and/or for which solutions is blow-up in finite time, as well as the regions that the solutions cannot leave. Together these theorems provide a criterion of the global solvability of semilinear DAEs. As a consequence, we obtain conditions for the global boundedness of solutions.

Criterion of the global solvability of regular and singular differential-algebraic equations

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive criterion for the global solvability of semilinear DAEs, addressing both regular and singular pencils via a block-operator pencil and direct-space decompositions. By reducing singular and regular DAEs to coupled ODE/AE systems and imposing consistency conditions on initial data, the authors establish conditions for global existence, Lagrange stability, and boundedness, and they formulate blow-up criteria through Lyapunov-type functions and differential inequalities. The results are unified in a global solvability framework that covers both regular and singular cases and is supported by concrete examples that illustrate global solvability versus finite-time blow-up. The practical impact lies in providing rigorous, checkable criteria for the long-term behavior of DAEs in engineering and physics models, enabling reliable prediction and control of complex dynamical systems.

Abstract

For regular and nonregular (singular) semilinear differential-algebraic equations (DAEs), we prove theorems on the existence and uniqueness of global solutions and on the blow-up of solutions, which allow one to identify the sets of initial values for which the initial value problem has global solutions and/or for which solutions is blow-up in finite time, as well as the regions that the solutions cannot leave. Together these theorems provide a criterion of the global solvability of semilinear DAEs. As a consequence, we obtain conditions for the global boundedness of solutions.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 21 theorems, 113 equations)

This paper contains 23 sections, 21 theorems, 113 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Let $f\in C({\mathcal{T}}\times D,{{\mathbb R}^n})$, where $D\subseteq {{\mathbb R}^n}$ is some open set and ${\mathcal{T}}=[t_+,\infty)\subseteq [0,\infty)$, and let the operator pencil $\lambda A+B$ be a regular pencil of index not higher than 1. Assume that there exists an open set $M_1\subseteq Then there exists a unique global (i.e., on $[t_0,\infty)$) solution of the IVP DAE, ini for each i

Theorems & Definitions (42)

  • Theorem 3.1
  • Corollary 3.1
  • Corollary 3.2
  • Corollary 3.3
  • Theorem 3.2
  • Remark 3.1
  • proof : The proof of Theorem \ref{['Th_GlobReg-LipschObl']}
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof : The proof of Corollary \ref{['Coroll-GlobReg1']}
  • Lemma 3.2
  • ...and 32 more