Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The non-decreasing condition on g-vectors

Mohamad Haerizadeh, Siamak Yassemi

TL;DR

This work introduces the non-decreasing condition on g-vectors and proves it is necessary and sufficient for the generically indecomposable summands of a g-vector to be linearly independent, with this property preserved under natural dilations by $t$. It then connects generic decompositions of g-vectors to decompositions of generically $\tau$-reduced components, showing that under the non-decreasing condition the number of such components in a generically $\tau$-reduced component satisfies $|\mathcal{Z}| \le |\Lambda|$, thereby addressing the Cerulli-Labardini-Schröer conjecture in a broad setting. The paper also clarifies the role of $ au$-reduced components in relation to 2-term silting theory and wall-and-chamber structures, providing a precise criterion for when a component achieves maximal cardinality. Finally, it offers practical numerical criteria to determine tameness versus wildness of g-vectors via $e(g,h)$ and related bilinear forms, enhancing the toolkit for analyzing representation types and component decompositions.

Abstract

The non-decreasing condition on g-vectors is introduced. Our study shows that this condition is both necessary and sufficient to ensure that the generically indecomposable direct summands of a given g-vector are linearly independent. Additionally, we prove that for any finite dimensional algebra $Λ$, under the non-decreasing condition, the number of generically indecomposable irreducible components that appear in the decomposition of a given generically $τ$-reduced component is lower than or equal to $|Λ|$. This solves the conjecture concerning the cardinality of component clusters by Cerulli-Labardini-Schröer, in a reasonable generality. Lastly, we study numerical criteria to check the wildness of g-vectors.

The non-decreasing condition on g-vectors

TL;DR

This work introduces the non-decreasing condition on g-vectors and proves it is necessary and sufficient for the generically indecomposable summands of a g-vector to be linearly independent, with this property preserved under natural dilations by . It then connects generic decompositions of g-vectors to decompositions of generically -reduced components, showing that under the non-decreasing condition the number of such components in a generically -reduced component satisfies , thereby addressing the Cerulli-Labardini-Schröer conjecture in a broad setting. The paper also clarifies the role of -reduced components in relation to 2-term silting theory and wall-and-chamber structures, providing a precise criterion for when a component achieves maximal cardinality. Finally, it offers practical numerical criteria to determine tameness versus wildness of g-vectors via and related bilinear forms, enhancing the toolkit for analyzing representation types and component decompositions.

Abstract

The non-decreasing condition on g-vectors is introduced. Our study shows that this condition is both necessary and sufficient to ensure that the generically indecomposable direct summands of a given g-vector are linearly independent. Additionally, we prove that for any finite dimensional algebra , under the non-decreasing condition, the number of generically indecomposable irreducible components that appear in the decomposition of a given generically -reduced component is lower than or equal to . This solves the conjecture concerning the cardinality of component clusters by Cerulli-Labardini-Schröer, in a reasonable generality. Lastly, we study numerical criteria to check the wildness of g-vectors.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 37 theorems, 63 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 37 theorems, 63 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $\{\mathcal{Z}_1, \mathcal{Z}_2,\cdots, \mathcal{Z}_s\}$ be a set of irreducible components of $\operatorname{rep}(\Lambda)$. Then the following statements are equivalent. In this case, $g^{\mathcal{Z}}=g^{\mathcal{Z}_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus g^{\mathcal{Z}_s}$ is the generic decomposition of $g^{\mathcal{Z}}$.

Theorems & Definitions (102)

  • Theorem 1: \ref{['thm6200']}
  • Theorem 2: \ref{['thm6500']}
  • Theorem 3: \ref{['cor6650']}
  • Theorem 4: \ref{['thm4700']}
  • Theorem 5: \ref{['thm7000']}
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.5
  • Lemma 1.7
  • proof
  • Remark 1.8
  • ...and 92 more