Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Joint Power Optimization and AP Selection for Secure Cell-Free Massive MIMO

Yasseen Sadoon Atiya, Zahra Mobini, Hien Quoc Ngo, Michail Matthaiou

TL;DR

The paper addresses secrecy in CF-mMIMO under active eavesdropping by jointly optimizing AP selection and downlink power control to minimize the eavesdropper's spectral efficiency while meeting legitimate users’ QoS. It converts the challenging mixed-integer nonconvex problem into a tractable form and solves it with an accelerated projected gradient (APG) method enhanced by a penalty framework and variable reparameterization. The proposed approach yields substantial secrecy performance gains, outperforming heuristic schemes (up to 265% higher 50th percentile SSE) and showing larger advantages when Eve is closer to the targeted user. This work demonstrates a scalable, low-complexity pathway to bolster physical-layer security in CF-mMIMO systems with active attacks, enabling more robust secure communications in dense deployments.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate joint power control and access point (AP) selection scheme in a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) system under an active eavesdropping attack, where an eavesdropper tries to overhear the signal sent to one of the legitimate users by contaminating the uplink channel estimation. We formulate a joint optimization problem to minimize the eavesdropping spectral efficiency (SE) while guaranteeing a given SE requirement at legitimate users. The challenging formulated problem is converted into a more tractable form and an efficient low-complexity accelerated projected gradient (APG)-based approach is proposed to solve it. Our findings reveal that the proposed joint optimization approach significantly outperforms the heuristic approaches in terms of secrecy SE (SSE). For instance, the $50\%$ likely SSE performance of the proposed approach is $265\%$ higher than that of equal power allocation and random AP selection scheme.

Joint Power Optimization and AP Selection for Secure Cell-Free Massive MIMO

TL;DR

The paper addresses secrecy in CF-mMIMO under active eavesdropping by jointly optimizing AP selection and downlink power control to minimize the eavesdropper's spectral efficiency while meeting legitimate users’ QoS. It converts the challenging mixed-integer nonconvex problem into a tractable form and solves it with an accelerated projected gradient (APG) method enhanced by a penalty framework and variable reparameterization. The proposed approach yields substantial secrecy performance gains, outperforming heuristic schemes (up to 265% higher 50th percentile SSE) and showing larger advantages when Eve is closer to the targeted user. This work demonstrates a scalable, low-complexity pathway to bolster physical-layer security in CF-mMIMO systems with active attacks, enabling more robust secure communications in dense deployments.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate joint power control and access point (AP) selection scheme in a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (CF-mMIMO) system under an active eavesdropping attack, where an eavesdropper tries to overhear the signal sent to one of the legitimate users by contaminating the uplink channel estimation. We formulate a joint optimization problem to minimize the eavesdropping spectral efficiency (SE) while guaranteeing a given SE requirement at legitimate users. The challenging formulated problem is converted into a more tractable form and an efficient low-complexity accelerated projected gradient (APG)-based approach is proposed to solve it. Our findings reveal that the proposed joint optimization approach significantly outperforms the heuristic approaches in terms of secrecy SE (SSE). For instance, the likely SSE performance of the proposed approach is higher than that of equal power allocation and random AP selection scheme.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 48 equations, 2 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 8 sections, 48 equations, 2 figures, 1 algorithm.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: CDFs of the SSE for three cases: EPA-random AP selection, OPA-random AP selection, and joint OPA-AP selection. Here, $L=300$, $M=4$, $K=40$, and $r_E =100$ m.
  • Figure 2: Average SSE vs $r_E$, $L=300$, $M=4$, and $K=40$.