Universal Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models: Backdoor Attacks for In-context Learning
Shuai Zhao, Meihuizi Jia, Luu Anh Tuan, Fengjun Pan, Jinming Wen
TL;DR
The paper reveals security weaknesses in in-context learning (ICL) by introducing ICLAttack, a training-free backdoor that contaminates the demonstration context through poisoned demonstrations or prompts to steer LLM outputs toward attacker-defined targets. It demonstrates that such backdoors achieve high attack success rates across a wide range of models (1.3B–180B parameters) and tasks while maintaining strong performance on clean data, without any fine-tuning. The work provides a formal threat model, two practical attack modalities, and extensive empirical results, including robustness across model sizes and partial defense responses. These findings underscore the need for defense mechanisms and safer prompt-design practices in ICL-based NLP systems.
Abstract
In-context learning, a paradigm bridging the gap between pre-training and fine-tuning, has demonstrated high efficacy in several NLP tasks, especially in few-shot settings. Despite being widely applied, in-context learning is vulnerable to malicious attacks. In this work, we raise security concerns regarding this paradigm. Our studies demonstrate that an attacker can manipulate the behavior of large language models by poisoning the demonstration context, without the need for fine-tuning the model. Specifically, we design a new backdoor attack method, named ICLAttack, to target large language models based on in-context learning. Our method encompasses two types of attacks: poisoning demonstration examples and poisoning demonstration prompts, which can make models behave in alignment with predefined intentions. ICLAttack does not require additional fine-tuning to implant a backdoor, thus preserving the model's generality. Furthermore, the poisoned examples are correctly labeled, enhancing the natural stealth of our attack method. Extensive experimental results across several language models, ranging in size from 1.3B to 180B parameters, demonstrate the effectiveness of our attack method, exemplified by a high average attack success rate of 95.0% across the three datasets on OPT models.
